Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Modern Warfare
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grabber" data-source="post: 16313659" data-attributes="member: 70485"><p>Here is my experience so far.</p><p></p><p>Beat the campaign. Very good story and I really like how they connected it to the first COD MW. You'll see what I mean when you beat the game.</p><p></p><p>Multiplayer is good. Action is fast paced, maps are larger, newer modes (Ground war which is 32v32, then 2v2 squads) plus the classic modes like TD, Search and Destroy, Headquarters, etc. They also have co-op spec ops which is great and offers a challenge. It continues the campaign story a bit too. </p><p></p><p>Elevation also plays a huge factor in the game too.</p><p></p><p>I've played BF3, BF4 and BF5. BF4 was good, but, they all have the same thing in common. Very unrealstic one-shot kills from a MASSIVE map with almost no effort. Even though there is elevation, too many people were able to somehow make consistent miracle shots. </p><p></p><p>Fyling was tough, tanks were cool. But, the maps were simply too large and don't have the time or patience to play a single match for 40 minutes. </p><p></p><p>I agree, bring back bad company. Those were good games. I did read that there is a BC 3 in the works. Not sure how solid that is, though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grabber, post: 16313659, member: 70485"] Here is my experience so far. Beat the campaign. Very good story and I really like how they connected it to the first COD MW. You'll see what I mean when you beat the game. Multiplayer is good. Action is fast paced, maps are larger, newer modes (Ground war which is 32v32, then 2v2 squads) plus the classic modes like TD, Search and Destroy, Headquarters, etc. They also have co-op spec ops which is great and offers a challenge. It continues the campaign story a bit too. Elevation also plays a huge factor in the game too. I've played BF3, BF4 and BF5. BF4 was good, but, they all have the same thing in common. Very unrealstic one-shot kills from a MASSIVE map with almost no effort. Even though there is elevation, too many people were able to somehow make consistent miracle shots. Fyling was tough, tanks were cool. But, the maps were simply too large and don't have the time or patience to play a single match for 40 minutes. I agree, bring back bad company. Those were good games. I did read that there is a BC 3 in the works. Not sure how solid that is, though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Modern Warfare
Top