Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
The Chow Hall
Military personnel, who would you side with?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="11dsgGT" data-source="post: 12591074" data-attributes="member: 104970"><p>Im saying that there are a lot of soldiers who know nothing but the regulation. Come off of leave and dont sign in, but at your place of duty, ucmj... dislike a soldier, hold them back dont promote to give them a chance to lead...overweight counsel, counsel, special pop ucmj... instead you could charge an extra day, promote and give responsibility/purpose, use your time to PT.</p><p>In every situation the leader does the right thing, but its wrong. There are so many people in the military who have this type of personality that there is no do doubt in my mind it wouldn't be any different than Syria....few stay with the government, but most leave to fight. </p><p></p><p>In this scenario there would be reason for the government to ask us to shoot civilians and that reason would be up to each individual soldiers interpretation.</p><p></p><p>I assume that you read the question, but failed to think why it would be asked. In your mind you only hear the question and that is exactly the point I am trying to make.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="11dsgGT, post: 12591074, member: 104970"] Im saying that there are a lot of soldiers who know nothing but the regulation. Come off of leave and dont sign in, but at your place of duty, ucmj... dislike a soldier, hold them back dont promote to give them a chance to lead...overweight counsel, counsel, special pop ucmj... instead you could charge an extra day, promote and give responsibility/purpose, use your time to PT. In every situation the leader does the right thing, but its wrong. There are so many people in the military who have this type of personality that there is no do doubt in my mind it wouldn't be any different than Syria....few stay with the government, but most leave to fight. In this scenario there would be reason for the government to ask us to shoot civilians and that reason would be up to each individual soldiers interpretation. I assume that you read the question, but failed to think why it would be asked. In your mind you only hear the question and that is exactly the point I am trying to make. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
The Chow Hall
Military personnel, who would you side with?
Top