Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
MHP 2012 E63 AMG Tune Only: 773HP & 925lb/ft SAE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fourcam330" data-source="post: 11665263" data-attributes="member: 24445"><p>Thanks guys! The car in fact did not hook in 4th gear necessitating us going to 5th gear to dyno lol. With 7 speeds this car is always in the powerband and acceleration is relentless even in higher gears where the old bi-turbo v12s died off. </p><p></p><p>Pics of the car here:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.2450201473064.87747.1792815268&type=3" target="_blank">Facebook</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Before you raise a BS flag about anything related to cars or internal combustion engines in general when in contradiction to what I post, do yourself a favor and don't. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>You have no argument whatsoever. The test was done on a DJ, not a DD, not a MD, not a SuperFlow. The numbers are SAE corrected and if you want to sit here and argue DT loss %'s with me be my guest. From Input Shaft to 76lb 19" wheel/tire combo I'm not worried. What's more it's as if you're making the translation of rw to crank (which happens daily and vice versa) a sort of black magic. You do realize that your trap speed at the end of a 1/4 mile is <strong>calculated</strong> based on how quickly your car passes a set distance at the end? Same principle. </p><p></p><p>Rating in rwhp for marketing purposes is retarded not only do you have typical dyno to dyno variation however one DD can read 100rwhp less than another using a 500rw car depending on how it's setup, etc. rw numbers are quite frankly all over the place (due mainly to the different brands of dynos) and 99% of those outside the U.S. don't use them or know what they are. Everyone understands crank numbers. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Everything was kept constant between the stock and post tune dynos less the tune. So explain how any of the variables listed matter...They don't. These aren't Mustangs. You don't swap trannys, you can't change rear gearing or stall converters, etc. </p><p></p><p>If you want to get down to it dynos suck period. They are better for FI cars (N/A will die unless you have serious fans and no one in the U.S. does) however are still not a true measure of performance like track and vbox testing. Being that we just tuned our car, it will be raced and vboxed next. You can also extrapolate crank HP/TQ from VBox numbers and they are just as accurate a measure as trap speed in the 1/4. </p><p></p><p>My SL65 was an 11.0@128+ car with just a tune, this car feels like it would rape it sideways. I'll call easy 130s with just a tune and DRs. </p><p></p><p>Check back in 5 weeks when I post 8XXHp and 1000lb/ft after we put a full exhaust on the car. :beer:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fourcam330, post: 11665263, member: 24445"] Thanks guys! The car in fact did not hook in 4th gear necessitating us going to 5th gear to dyno lol. With 7 speeds this car is always in the powerband and acceleration is relentless even in higher gears where the old bi-turbo v12s died off. Pics of the car here: [url=http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.2450201473064.87747.1792815268&type=3]Facebook[/url] Before you raise a BS flag about anything related to cars or internal combustion engines in general when in contradiction to what I post, do yourself a favor and don't. :) You have no argument whatsoever. The test was done on a DJ, not a DD, not a MD, not a SuperFlow. The numbers are SAE corrected and if you want to sit here and argue DT loss %'s with me be my guest. From Input Shaft to 76lb 19" wheel/tire combo I'm not worried. What's more it's as if you're making the translation of rw to crank (which happens daily and vice versa) a sort of black magic. You do realize that your trap speed at the end of a 1/4 mile is [b]calculated[/b] based on how quickly your car passes a set distance at the end? Same principle. Rating in rwhp for marketing purposes is retarded not only do you have typical dyno to dyno variation however one DD can read 100rwhp less than another using a 500rw car depending on how it's setup, etc. rw numbers are quite frankly all over the place (due mainly to the different brands of dynos) and 99% of those outside the U.S. don't use them or know what they are. Everyone understands crank numbers. Everything was kept constant between the stock and post tune dynos less the tune. So explain how any of the variables listed matter...They don't. These aren't Mustangs. You don't swap trannys, you can't change rear gearing or stall converters, etc. If you want to get down to it dynos suck period. They are better for FI cars (N/A will die unless you have serious fans and no one in the U.S. does) however are still not a true measure of performance like track and vbox testing. Being that we just tuned our car, it will be raced and vboxed next. You can also extrapolate crank HP/TQ from VBox numbers and they are just as accurate a measure as trap speed in the 1/4. My SL65 was an 11.0@128+ car with just a tune, this car feels like it would rape it sideways. I'll call easy 130s with just a tune and DRs. Check back in 5 weeks when I post 8XXHp and 1000lb/ft after we put a full exhaust on the car. :beer: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
MHP 2012 E63 AMG Tune Only: 773HP & 925lb/ft SAE
Top