Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Man opens fire at a clinic.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve@TF" data-source="post: 16577346" data-attributes="member: 40308"><p>if you have a felony conviction than you have pretty much lost some important rights, including the 2A. if a psyche doctor feels someone is a serious risk to society they can contact the police about it. these are already two important safeguards in place. "the right to bear arms shall not be infringed"</p><p></p><p>someone else mentioned a friend who was blocked from buying a gun because they take medication iirc.. ill be all the cash in my wallet (not much) that there are plenty of LEOs on anti-depressants and other prescription drugs that have the ability to carry 24-7. prescription meds for mental issues are prescribed by a treating physician, who has the ability to report said person to the police if they genuinely feel their patient is a credible/serious threat to themselves and/or others. if they were to blanket ban everyone because they take meds then you would have a whole lot of people not taking them for that reason. should we ban every single veteran who has ptsd? are all of them a risk to society? im sure plenty of LEOs have it too from crazy shit theyve dealt with. should they lose their ability to carry a weapon? eventually they start adding all kind of reasons to be included in the "banned" group and we end up like other countries where practically nobody can own them (unless youre rich or connected). </p><p></p><p>i was watching a documentary about buying a gun, legally, in mexico. there is ONE gun store in the entire country (per this documentary) and its on a military base. after months and mountains of paperwork you finally are permitted to go that base/store to buy a weapon. it takes hours to get in and get out. i dont recall if it was expensive, but it was a major pita. one guy who was a business owner was waiting at the store to get his gun for a few hours already. he said he could have easily walked into a back alley and purchased a handgun off someone for a few hundred bucks but he wanted to do it legally. what a great system they have there. heavily regulated and restricted. meanwhile, they have literal war in the streets with rpgs, machine guns and grenades lol.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve@TF, post: 16577346, member: 40308"] if you have a felony conviction than you have pretty much lost some important rights, including the 2A. if a psyche doctor feels someone is a serious risk to society they can contact the police about it. these are already two important safeguards in place. "the right to bear arms shall not be infringed" someone else mentioned a friend who was blocked from buying a gun because they take medication iirc.. ill be all the cash in my wallet (not much) that there are plenty of LEOs on anti-depressants and other prescription drugs that have the ability to carry 24-7. prescription meds for mental issues are prescribed by a treating physician, who has the ability to report said person to the police if they genuinely feel their patient is a credible/serious threat to themselves and/or others. if they were to blanket ban everyone because they take meds then you would have a whole lot of people not taking them for that reason. should we ban every single veteran who has ptsd? are all of them a risk to society? im sure plenty of LEOs have it too from crazy shit theyve dealt with. should they lose their ability to carry a weapon? eventually they start adding all kind of reasons to be included in the "banned" group and we end up like other countries where practically nobody can own them (unless youre rich or connected). i was watching a documentary about buying a gun, legally, in mexico. there is ONE gun store in the entire country (per this documentary) and its on a military base. after months and mountains of paperwork you finally are permitted to go that base/store to buy a weapon. it takes hours to get in and get out. i dont recall if it was expensive, but it was a major pita. one guy who was a business owner was waiting at the store to get his gun for a few hours already. he said he could have easily walked into a back alley and purchased a handgun off someone for a few hundred bucks but he wanted to do it legally. what a great system they have there. heavily regulated and restricted. meanwhile, they have literal war in the streets with rpgs, machine guns and grenades lol. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Man opens fire at a clinic.
Top