Lightning guys: What do you think of this claim?

EB85

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2015
Messages
537
Location
SE PA
[h=1]GMC Syclone: After 25 Years, It’s Still The King of Sports Trucks[/h]
After two months of employment at Fast Lane Classic Cars in St. Charles, Mo., I must admit that working at a classic car dealership certainly has its perks — especially for an auto enthusiast like me.
While I’m sure Toyota salesmen get their jollies from driving around in a hybrid Camry or Prius, there’s nothing quite like the feeling of taking a customer for a spirited test-drive in a 1991 GMC Syclone.
Inspired by the Buick Grand National, the Syclone is a funnel of terror on the streets. With a turbocharged engine and rear-biased all-wheel drive system, the Syclone stands alone as the world’s fastest production truck nearly 25 years after its demise. How many other cars can you say that about?
You can imagine my excitement when I overheard that a customer from Illinois was here to see the Syclone. I sprung from my office chair faster than Bugs Bunny from his rabbit hole to grab the set of keys.
Though my time behind the wheel of the Syclone was short-lived, it certainly wasn’t wasted. As I rolled to a stop just before the three-lane intersection, I resisted the strong urge to apply my left foot to the brake pedal and spool up the Syclone’s Mitsubishi-sourced turbocharger with the accelerator pedal. While daydreaming of the impending launch, I soon realized it was my turn to go. Brake boosting would have to wait. As I buried the pedal, it quickly became clear that this boosted bad boy didn’t need any help.
With very minimal turbo lag, the Syclone launched from the intersection while its sticky Cooper RS3-A all-season rubber chirped in defiance as they struggled to transmit the Syclone’s ghastly 350 pound-feet to the pavement. With my neck pinned against the headrest, a school-girl giggle escaped as the archaic boost gauge needle soared to 14 pounds per square inch. Sixty miles per hour came alarmingly fast, and I reluctantly let off the throttle. The loud exhale from the factory blow-off valve immediately followed.


Even 25 years later, it’s hard to find a single truck that is as rewarding to drive. Whether it’s launching from a stoplight or zipping through a double S-curve, the Syclone is turbocharged nirvana disguised as an S-10 pickup.
While hooning the king of the sport truck segment is nothing less than exhilarating, the story of its creation is nearly as intriguing. After the last Grand National rolled off the assembly line in 1987, Buick engineers were getting a little stir crazy after the brand’s most notable performance car was discontinued from its lineup. Though they had helped Pontiac create its Turbo Trans Am using Buick’s LC2 3.8-liter V6 engine, it didn’t feel the same with an arrowhead badge in place of the familiar tri-shield.
To show the world that Buick performance was far from dead, engineers fitted a rear-wheel drive Chevrolet S-10 with its infamous turbocharged powerplant and Grand National exterior badging and wheels. Even the “turbo bulge” hood was transferred over. But General Motors shot down Buick’s proposal to build a turbocharged Grand National pickup — leaving us only to imagine what could have been.
Chevrolet was also intrigued but already had the 454 SS as the brand’s sport truck offering and didn’t want the two models to compete against each other. Instead, the idea was proposed to GMC who was just crazy enough to try it.


Buick’s turbocharged 3.8-liter V6 engine required costly modifications to fit in the Sonoma’s cramped engine bay, so a boosted version of the 4.3-liter LB4 Vortec V6 would have to suffice. Paired to a four-speed 4L60 automatic transmission borrowed from the Corvette, the 280-horsepower boosted-six enabled the the Syclone to accelerate from zero to 60 miles per hour in only 4.6 seconds and complete the quarter-mile in the low 13-second range.
In September 1991, Car and Driver was so impressed by the Syclone’s performance that they pitted it against a brand new $122,000 Ferrari 348ts. Amazingly, the $25,000 pickup beat the Italian supercar in both the quarter-mile and acceleration tests.
After 2,995 units were produced in 1991, the Syclone was discontinued after just one year. Though it may it may have been a sales flop, the limited-production pickup has since gained the attention of automotive enthusiasts and collectors alike. Though the Ford Lighting and Dodge Ram SRT-10 sport trucks have come and gone, neither was able to match the Syclone’s herculean zero-to-60 time.
Visually, the Syclone looks to be nothing more than a black Sonoma with a lowered ride height, plastic ground effects and 16-inch aluminum wheels. But its modest styling arguably makes the truck even more alluring. To all but those who know of its legendary performance, the Syclone will forever be the ultimate sleeper.

Cliffnotes: He claims the Syclone to be the baddest factory truck ever due to it's 0-60 time. Last time I checked, 0-60 was only a small part of grading a vehicle overall. Don't get me wrong. I think the Sy/Ty is a bad little unit. But is it on a higher pedestal than a Lightning?

Edit: http://www.cheatsheet.com/automobiles/gmc-syclone-after-25-years-its-still-the-king-of-sports-trucks.html/?a=viewall
 

PACETTR

Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
360
Location
Yukon, OK
I think it's a fair argument in the context of showroom stock trucks. When mods come into play it's game over.
 

4a7191a

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2004
Messages
2,694
Location
beaumont texas
They were bad in 91 , compared to the older lightnings still bad. Compared to the 99 lightning's. Game over for out dated drivetrain.
I'd love to own one and keep it as a collector for sure.. Absolutely love the lightning I have. Several of my pals throw offers at me every so often. But I keep her. Such a great all around vehicle that currently has no replacement and might not ever have one. Imo
 

EB85

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2015
Messages
537
Location
SE PA
Game over for out dated drivetrain.

That's kinda what I thought. Pretty revolutionary for it's day but turbo and drivetrain technology has come a long way in 25 years. Plus the L can actually be used as a truck if so desired.
 

Russo

Unofficial Glass Tech
Established Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
652
Location
Gray, LA
Nostalgia is like love, blindly accepted by idiots for the moment.. Ha-ha
 

thomas91169

# of bans = 5203
Established Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
25,662
Location
San Diego, CA
They were the DSM of the truck world. Came factory turbocharged with a stout motor and drive train. Cheap to get great gains out of but also like the DSM they became susceptible to unreliability due to owner shortcomings and half assed modding. Now they're unreliable due to age.
 

Dusten

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
14,924
Location
Conway, Wa
Motor and TC were tough as were viscous setups. Trans are junk. Typical 700r4 BS. Prob most common complaint.

and front half shafts, drive shafts... interiors were trash.

But, that said they were a 14 second truck, stock.
 

SVT-BansheeMan

up the bayou
Established Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
5,035
Location
Lockport, Louisiana
Doesnt bother me any. Im happy for someone who enjoys what they own. I just really wish the gen 2 L came with a better bottom end and working knock sensors. Many many engines would of been saved. Some people still think a good tune will make their truck bullet proof.
 

Blown 89

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
8,710
Location
AZ
Seems like a fair assessment. The Syclone was a bad ass little truck. I'd love to have one in my driveway.
 

kevinatfms

Ex-Ford/Kia/Hyundai Tech
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
4,981
Location
Maryland
Cliffnotes: He claims the Syclone to be the baddest factory truck ever due to it's 0-60 time. Last time I checked, 0-60 was only a small part of grading a vehicle overall. Don't get me wrong. I think the Sy/Ty is a bad little unit. But is it on a higher pedestal than a Lightning?

I owned both. I had a 2002 Lightning and a 1992 Typhoon(not a syclone but close enough) and can say without a doubt the stop light warrior was the Typhoon. The Lightning was a badass truck but the AWD and launch characteristics of the Typhoon were insane. I ran a few low 14's in the Ty but felt like it would eat my Lightning stock for stock. The Lightning ran 13.60's factory stock and felt fast but didnt have the traction the Typhoon did.

I miss both trucks but would get another Typhoon if the right one came around while id pass on another Lightning.

I find it funny that they didnt mention the Ram SRT 10. I would think a 500hp V10 Viper powered pickup to be pretty off the wall nuts.
 

hockeylover86

Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
386
Location
Michigan
My opinions, the Sy is a truck in appearance only, it really can't do much truck stuff. I would think a last gen Jeep SRT GC would out launch a Sy/Ty and be a bit faster in the 1/4.

Stock for stock a 3.5EB or 6.2L Chevy would give one a run...
 

truefiveo

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
2,837
Location
Miami Beach
My opinions, the Sy is a truck in appearance only, it really can't do much truck stuff. I would think a last gen Jeep SRT GC would out launch a Sy/Ty and be a bit faster in the 1/4.

Stock for stock a 3.5EB or 6.2L Chevy would give one a run...

Its pretty much an El Camino
 

black99lightnin

move along
Established Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
13,088
Location
Louisiana
Can a Syclone do this?

GEDC0282.JPG


Then not a truck.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top