Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Keep Paxton or go with Turbo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roll Race Rob" data-source="post: 9066905" data-attributes="member: 88459"><p>what does your tuner know that other tuner's don't? </p><p>the only way he can make such a comment would be by assuming im running A LOT of timing, thereby making it unsafe on 91 onctane. </p><p>who's to say my timing is unsafe?</p><p>other than that his comment is as blind as 61mmstang.</p><p></p><p></p><p>your math/equation is once again flawed and will be proven so by a SLEW of cars making more power on less boost than what your mcgoole equation derives, i do not have the time right now to do so but will show you plenty of REAL WORLD numbers proving your mcgoogle equation wrong. </p><p>as far as your comment regarding john's twin set up, i NEVER ONCE claimed my single 80 outflows his twin 77's, i merely stated my single 80 outflow's his single 77's, one at a time. </p><p>as far as this comment "Not to mention that your untouched B heads and intake cannot take full advantage of your 80mm turbo cfm flow to begin with!" you are obviously still thinking inside the box, turbo's have proven time and time again the cfm your heads/intake/engine flows n/a is NOT the bottleneck when it comes to turbo cars, turbo's prove this in that 2 litre 4 cylinder honduhs flow DICK n/a, yet when strapped with a large turbo those DICK numbers go out the window!</p><p>ill be back with plenty of other motor/turbo set ups proving your mcgoogle equation false! :read:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roll Race Rob, post: 9066905, member: 88459"] what does your tuner know that other tuner's don't? the only way he can make such a comment would be by assuming im running A LOT of timing, thereby making it unsafe on 91 onctane. who's to say my timing is unsafe? other than that his comment is as blind as 61mmstang. your math/equation is once again flawed and will be proven so by a SLEW of cars making more power on less boost than what your mcgoole equation derives, i do not have the time right now to do so but will show you plenty of REAL WORLD numbers proving your mcgoogle equation wrong. as far as your comment regarding john's twin set up, i NEVER ONCE claimed my single 80 outflows his twin 77's, i merely stated my single 80 outflow's his single 77's, one at a time. as far as this comment "Not to mention that your untouched B heads and intake cannot take full advantage of your 80mm turbo cfm flow to begin with!" you are obviously still thinking inside the box, turbo's have proven time and time again the cfm your heads/intake/engine flows n/a is NOT the bottleneck when it comes to turbo cars, turbo's prove this in that 2 litre 4 cylinder honduhs flow DICK n/a, yet when strapped with a large turbo those DICK numbers go out the window! ill be back with plenty of other motor/turbo set ups proving your mcgoogle equation false! :read: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Keep Paxton or go with Turbo
Top