Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Keep Paxton or go with Turbo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="97desertCobra" data-source="post: 9066830" data-attributes="member: 53488"><p>An engine in n/a form is experiencing 14.7 pounds per square inch of pressure and makes x amount of horse power. Lets just say this engine makes 300rwhp. Now in order to double the amount of horse power that engine is producing you would have to double the amount of atmospheric pressure that it is experiencing. So now your turbo is pushing 14.7 psi and you car is making 600rwhp. </p><p></p><p>The above example is that in a perfect world with no parasitic loss, no loss from heat or friction of any kind. In the real world even the best turbo cant touch the perfect example, some can get close when they really push alot of boost in their efficiency range. So the only way for that 300rwhp engine to make more than 600rwhp with less than 14.7 psi of boost is to make more horse power n/a. How much power does your car with untouched B heads and intake make n/a do you think? 280rwhp? That would be my guess. So how is it that this magical turbo of yours can bend the laws of physics? </p><p></p><p>Please explain how your car is the exception? Never have I ever heard of any one making 700rwhp with a 4.6 and 10 PSI. Even the 03 Cobras running 80mm and larger cant touch that, and their cylinder heads flow more cfm than yours do. Your car would have to be making between 420-500rwhp n/a to make 700rwhp with 10# boost. </p><p></p><p>As for your arguement against Johns car and his turbos, the twins use their combined efficiency and cfm to work together, thats why people use a twin set up. How do you think the cfm flow of two 77mm turbos compare to your single 80mm turbo? Not to mention that your untouched B heads and intake cannot take full advantage of your 80mm turbo cfm flow to begin with!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="97desertCobra, post: 9066830, member: 53488"] An engine in n/a form is experiencing 14.7 pounds per square inch of pressure and makes x amount of horse power. Lets just say this engine makes 300rwhp. Now in order to double the amount of horse power that engine is producing you would have to double the amount of atmospheric pressure that it is experiencing. So now your turbo is pushing 14.7 psi and you car is making 600rwhp. The above example is that in a perfect world with no parasitic loss, no loss from heat or friction of any kind. In the real world even the best turbo cant touch the perfect example, some can get close when they really push alot of boost in their efficiency range. So the only way for that 300rwhp engine to make more than 600rwhp with less than 14.7 psi of boost is to make more horse power n/a. How much power does your car with untouched B heads and intake make n/a do you think? 280rwhp? That would be my guess. So how is it that this magical turbo of yours can bend the laws of physics? Please explain how your car is the exception? Never have I ever heard of any one making 700rwhp with a 4.6 and 10 PSI. Even the 03 Cobras running 80mm and larger cant touch that, and their cylinder heads flow more cfm than yours do. Your car would have to be making between 420-500rwhp n/a to make 700rwhp with 10# boost. As for your arguement against Johns car and his turbos, the twins use their combined efficiency and cfm to work together, thats why people use a twin set up. How do you think the cfm flow of two 77mm turbos compare to your single 80mm turbo? Not to mention that your untouched B heads and intake cannot take full advantage of your 80mm turbo cfm flow to begin with! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
The Blower Bistro
Keep Paxton or go with Turbo
Top