Yea, it makes sense in my head considering the universe is an 'explosion' OF space, not an explosion in space. I just can't quite visualize the actually imagery and how it can be skewed at those distances.You're more correct than you may realize. _IF_ inflation happened in the very few first nanoseconds of the universe's existence*, we don't really know how big it may be. Because all we can see, due the limit of the speed of light and the expansion of the universe, we can only observe the 93-billion light-year "sphere." And we only see that much as a side-effect of the universe's expansion.** Otherwise, we'd only see a 26-billion light year sphere.
*There's lots of evidence to support Guth's Theory of Inflation. So far it is the leading contender for explaining the universe we see. But some heavy hitters in astronomy have always disagreed with the Theory of Inflation.
** The expansion of the universe has always been attributed to Edwin Hubble. However, for his entire life, he said what he discovered was a way to explain the red-shift of light from farther distances. He himself never supported, nor disagreed with, the idea that the red-shift was caused by expansion.
Then again, those flat earthen, moon conspiracy theorists may be on to something as well