Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
The Terminator
Terminator Talk
I've been RIPPED OFF! Don't you be fooled too!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="03yellow" data-source="post: 9887810" data-attributes="member: 19927"><p>Your definition of slander is not the legal definition. Sounds like something from Webster. </p><p>Ray has accused LFP of doing something illegal; not true. He accused LFP of stealing; legally not true. Here's what LFP needs to show for a case of Slander/ Liable(written). </p><p>A plaintiff who wishes to sue an individual or entity for libel or slander has the burden of proving four claims to a court: First, the plaintiff must show that the DEFENDANT communicated a defamatory statement. Second, the plaintiff must show that the statement was published or communicated to at least one other person besides the plaintiff. Third, the plaintiff must show that the communication was about the plaintiff and that another party receiving the communication could identify the plaintiff as the subject of the defamatory message. Fourth, the plaintiff must show that the communication injured the plaintiff's reputation.</p><p> LFP could take Ray to court. It's case meets all the criteria listed above. </p><p>Not only that but they could state that someone(me) was even pointing out what Ray was doing was slanderous and that he responded to the information. </p><p>He not ignorant of the implications of what he is doing to the reputation of LPF. Nor is SVTP</p><p>I've been called slow, amusing, yeller and several other things but I'm not stupid. </p><p>I don't think emotionally when it comes to business; I can't afford to in this era of legal opportunity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="03yellow, post: 9887810, member: 19927"] Your definition of slander is not the legal definition. Sounds like something from Webster. Ray has accused LFP of doing something illegal; not true. He accused LFP of stealing; legally not true. Here's what LFP needs to show for a case of Slander/ Liable(written). A plaintiff who wishes to sue an individual or entity for libel or slander has the burden of proving four claims to a court: First, the plaintiff must show that the DEFENDANT communicated a defamatory statement. Second, the plaintiff must show that the statement was published or communicated to at least one other person besides the plaintiff. Third, the plaintiff must show that the communication was about the plaintiff and that another party receiving the communication could identify the plaintiff as the subject of the defamatory message. Fourth, the plaintiff must show that the communication injured the plaintiff's reputation. LFP could take Ray to court. It's case meets all the criteria listed above. Not only that but they could state that someone(me) was even pointing out what Ray was doing was slanderous and that he responded to the information. He not ignorant of the implications of what he is doing to the reputation of LPF. Nor is SVTP I've been called slow, amusing, yeller and several other things but I'm not stupid. I don't think emotionally when it comes to business; I can't afford to in this era of legal opportunity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
The Terminator
Terminator Talk
I've been RIPPED OFF! Don't you be fooled too!
Top