Inspecting Camshaft Base Circle Runout

03Steve

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
1,867
Location
St. Louis
Cams: Comp Cams 106360
Valve Lift: .475 Intake / .450 Exhaust
Lobe Lift: .263 Intake / .250 Exhaust
Intake Duration: 230 degrees @ .050 valve lift
Exhaust Duration: 232 degrees @ .050 valve lift
Base Circle Runout Tolerance: .0005" or less


Last night I measured the left intake camshaft. I am using a .0001" digital dial indicator, and a roller tip. There is no measureable runout on the tip. The roller tip is used to minimize pointer deflection, in lieu of dragging a round tip on cam lobes. I also use the shortest overall pointer length possible to minimize deflection. Preloading the pointer down assists with this.

Maximum tolerance for base circle runout is .0005", per J. Mihovetz's recommendation in the now ancient "Crower Cams" topic on modularfords from 2006.

http://www.modularfords.com/threads/45339-Crower-Cams



I should note that Comp Cams tolerance is equal or less than .0015." This tolerance is three times higher than listed above. Therefore it is good practice to check. Comp Cams does report that it is not uncommon to see .0001" or less base circle runout on their products, according to tech support.

Of the 8 lobes on the left intake, the highest measureable base circle runout was .0003". I found this on 2 of 8 lobes. The runout on the Comp Cams is highest just before one of the lobe opening points. The rest of the 6 lobes all measured .0001".

This is the following runout report on the left intake cam:

Left Intake Comp Cams 106360

1: .0003"
2: .0003"
3: .0001"
4: .0001"
5: .0001"
6: .0001"
7: .0001"
8: .0001"



One other note...

I have already checked lobe lift across all 32. They are not all uniform...although most are close. One came out .002" less than the others. Multiplying by the 1.81 rocker ratio, the valve will open .0036" less than the rest . In my case, it will produce ~.472" valve lift instead of .475" lift.

I feel it's important to blueprint lobe lift variations as a consideration for inspection of piston to valve clearance. If you set piston to valve with a lobe that is "short", the rest of your clearances will be tighter.


-Steve


DSCN0115.jpg


BaseCircleWheel1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SlowSVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
8,272
Location
Los Angeles
Good write-up

Your always at the mercy of the company or guy who machined the part. The runout on a cam lobe especially one that uses a roller is not as critical as the main, rod and cam journals as you know, I think your in pretty good shape. I wonder if anyone has blueprinted the factory cams. The lobes are pressed out of powdered metal and swaged into the shaft.

Doing this I know your going to set the valve stem height.......... ALL 32 OF THEM! :cryying:
 

na svt

say no to power adders
Established Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
11,248
Location
Beavercreek, Ohio
[I feel it's important to blueprint lobe lift variations as a consideration for inspection of piston to valve clearance. If you set piston to valve with a lobe that is "short", the rest of your clearances will be tighter. -Steve

Max lift doesn't occur until the piston is down the hole well over 100 degrees of crankshaft rotation (more than half way) so it (max lift) has no bearing on PTV clearance. PTV contact occurs when the piston is near TDC when the valve is open is less than half way open.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top