I take shits bigger than Conor Mcgreger!

scott_0

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2011
Messages
4,337
Location
Pa
that’s hilarious


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

CompOrange04GT

Anyone have a strap on my girl can use on me?
Established Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
8,565
Location
Texas
Mcgregor in his prime > Lesnar

One was well rounded one wasn’t
 

kaz109

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
6,069
Location
Cali
Are you on crack? Connor on the best day of his life vs an NCAA champion that has 100 pounds on him... seriously?
I think you took this out of context. He’s saying Conor was a better fighter in his division then lesnar in his and there is no denying that.
 

Junior00

Hurter Of Delicate Vaginas
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
2,575
Location
Ga
I think you took this out of context. He’s saying Conor was a better fighter in his division then lesnar in his and there is no denying that.

Meh, you can’t compare two divisions that far apart honestly. With diverticulitis sidelining Brock’s career which never seemed to recover its hard to say what might have been.

Conor is what, 10-4 since joining the UFC? I wouldn’t consider that world beater by any stretch either.

The striker vs grappler argument is forever ongoing, and tbh we never saw Brock in true prime between WWE, sickness, and age at which he focused on MMA.

Athletically, Brock by a long shot. Self promotion, Conor.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top