Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Gun Porn Thread!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MarcSpaz" data-source="post: 15494870" data-attributes="member: 183445"><p>I have the second gen MPX and the Evo 3 S1... the MPX walks circles around the Scorpion. But, you are talking about an $800 pistol compared to a $1,500 pistol. It sure as heck needs to be better at twice the price.</p><p></p><p>They are both nice, but the SIG is a lot more like an AR, which I am intimately familiar. That makes it easier to transition to. The BCG seems to have less mass, giving a bit less felt recoil. The trigger is much smoother and is more easily upgradable since its an AR trigger.</p><p></p><p>Another thing that I like more... the Evo is almost all polymer. The MPX is all metal. I am not a fan of polymer weapons after having two of them break (crack) after minimal use. (Glock being the exception. Love my G17.)</p><p></p><p>Also, if you decide to SBR the pistol later or add a brace, the parts seem to be a bit more common for the MPX.</p><p></p><p>The biggest difference was, I HAD to spend money on the Evo after the purchase in order to be able to use it. The Evo ambi safety sucks. It was digging into my knuckle on my trigger finger, making it extremely painful to fire, even a few shots.</p><p></p><p>I also like the looks of the MPX more.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line, even though I have a lot of complaints about the Evo, they are both great shooters and if you have a tight budget, the Evo will get it done. If money is not such an issue, the MPX is a much better weapon, IMHO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MarcSpaz, post: 15494870, member: 183445"] I have the second gen MPX and the Evo 3 S1... the MPX walks circles around the Scorpion. But, you are talking about an $800 pistol compared to a $1,500 pistol. It sure as heck needs to be better at twice the price. They are both nice, but the SIG is a lot more like an AR, which I am intimately familiar. That makes it easier to transition to. The BCG seems to have less mass, giving a bit less felt recoil. The trigger is much smoother and is more easily upgradable since its an AR trigger. Another thing that I like more... the Evo is almost all polymer. The MPX is all metal. I am not a fan of polymer weapons after having two of them break (crack) after minimal use. (Glock being the exception. Love my G17.) Also, if you decide to SBR the pistol later or add a brace, the parts seem to be a bit more common for the MPX. The biggest difference was, I HAD to spend money on the Evo after the purchase in order to be able to use it. The Evo ambi safety sucks. It was digging into my knuckle on my trigger finger, making it extremely painful to fire, even a few shots. I also like the looks of the MPX more. Bottom line, even though I have a lot of complaints about the Evo, they are both great shooters and if you have a tight budget, the Evo will get it done. If money is not such an issue, the MPX is a much better weapon, IMHO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Gun Porn Thread!!!
Top