Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
GT500 vs GT350
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tob" data-source="post: 16280159" data-attributes="member: 83412"><p>If you read Steve's article at Hot Rod you see mention that the test cars were consuming tires at the rate of four per hour. I hope that with a track optimized alignment, read: more negative camber, that one can reduce the propensity for this thing to devour some fairly expensive shoes so quickly. <em>And</em> be even faster.</p><p></p><p>Nick, which version would this be?</p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]autrPigRodw[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tob, post: 16280159, member: 83412"] If you read Steve's article at Hot Rod you see mention that the test cars were consuming tires at the rate of four per hour. I hope that with a track optimized alignment, read: more negative camber, that one can reduce the propensity for this thing to devour some fairly expensive shoes so quickly. [i]And[/i] be even faster. Nick, which version would this be? [MEDIA=youtube]autrPigRodw[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
GT500 vs GT350
Top