Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Wheels/Tires/Brakes
GT500 Hyper Dark from American Muscle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Norm Peterson" data-source="post: 16396983" data-attributes="member: 193960"><p>I suspect that +35 was chosen to end up close to flush, as that seems to be the most popular appearance goal as far as wheels & tires are concerned.</p><p></p><p>How much 'poke' is really going to bother you? This is what about 3/4" poke looks like - <strong>could you live with 1/4"</strong> if you weren't running as much negative camber as this (I did do some quick math comparing your wheel dimensions to mine)?. Would you dial in a little extra negative camber (like what's in the picture) to bring the tops of the tires back to/toward flush?</p><p></p><p>Or do you need the tires to fully tuck inside the sheetmetal?</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1632722[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>FWIW, the wheels in the picture are 11" wide, with offset not too much different from +35, so they would sit with about half of the 'extra' 1.5" of width on the outside, 3/4" further outward. That's where the 3/4" came from.</p><p></p><p>Hope this can help at least a little.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Norm</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Norm Peterson, post: 16396983, member: 193960"] I suspect that +35 was chosen to end up close to flush, as that seems to be the most popular appearance goal as far as wheels & tires are concerned. How much 'poke' is really going to bother you? This is what about 3/4" poke looks like - [b]could you live with 1/4"[/b] if you weren't running as much negative camber as this (I did do some quick math comparing your wheel dimensions to mine)?. Would you dial in a little extra negative camber (like what's in the picture) to bring the tops of the tires back to/toward flush? Or do you need the tires to fully tuck inside the sheetmetal? [ATTACH=full]1632722[/ATTACH] FWIW, the wheels in the picture are 11" wide, with offset not too much different from +35, so they would sit with about half of the 'extra' 1.5" of width on the outside, 3/4" further outward. That's where the 3/4" came from. Hope this can help at least a little. Norm [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Wheels/Tires/Brakes
GT500 Hyper Dark from American Muscle
Top