I saw that car today too. It went 11.120 @ 124.93 with a lower stage blower than a 5 (4) that POSI tweeked up nicely. Who was that?
this guys knows what Im talking about!
I saw that car today too. It went 11.120 @ 124.93 with a lower stage blower than a 5 (4) that POSI tweeked up nicely. Who was that?
So I've been keeping up to date on this thread, and I also think that it's only fair if everything is at the same boost level.. But that's not really going to happen. So I say
1. POSI, get a Snakebite blower and do the same thing that STIEG did but u do it to your liking.. measuring everything at the same boost
2. POSI, rebuild the front snouts the way that STIEG did and then conduct testing..
3. STIEG, take a stage 5+ and test it against POSI's race blower with the same pulley. that would be fair because the front snout won't be rebuilt..
That's how I see it being fair because the test that he did would be like comparing a D1 blower and a F1 blower. the ratio's are different internally..
So I've been keeping up to date on this thread, and I also think that it's only fair if everything is at the same boost level.. But that's not really going to happen. So I say
1. POSI, get a Snakebite blower and do the same thing that STIEG did but u do it to your liking.. measuring everything at the same boost
2. POSI, rebuild the front snouts the way that STIEG did and then conduct testing..
3. STIEG, take a stage 5+ and test it against POSI's race blower with the same pulley. that would be fair because the front snout won't be rebuilt..
That's how I see it being fair because the test that he did would be like comparing a D1 blower and a F1 blower. the ratio's are different internally..
The part I put in bold should be what the comparison test should be all about. The snakebite blower with the rotor/gearing speed changed is like comparing apples to oranges when having the same size pulley on a blower that dont have the gearing changed. Its common sense. Spin the blowers at the same rotor RPM, then coduct flow/hp tests.
If you would actually read the thread instead of just posting you'd see he has posted results of a stage 5 port versus the before mentioned race port.
Now...I'm not saying I agree with everything posting in his results. I also think anyone who decides on one port over the other based off of this thread is stupid as well. Numbers are just numbers, they don't mean a thing to me.
With that said, I'm running a stage V steggy port on my own car. Numbers mean nothing to me. Run what you want until you're happy with the results.
Stage 5, 2.76 upper, 2# lower. 490/490. If I cared about numbers I would have changed already.
I didnt bother to read all 17 pages.
I do know this from experience:
Ive been to different dynos and tuners from coast to coast. Any tuner or 'tooner' can make a huge horsepower # on the dyno with increased timing. The reason this is possible (without pinging) is because there is no load on the car. I dont care if the dyno is a "loaded" model, it still cannot duplicate 2 tons of car and wind resistance, period.
I stopped looking at horsepower #'s years ago and base any companies product, port, etc on MPH at the track. That is the only true measre of how a Hi-Po product stacks up.
so glad i dont have a Heaton...
why? they make cheap decent power. my eaton along with others run faster than most whipple/KB cars
i really dont see what all the fuss is about, the way i race is run what you brung and if someone spends the money for the snakebite tm and gets a regeared snot then they deserve it cause they paid for it...but anyways why dont the other porters who are trying to discredit stieg just send in some money and buy a snakebite? stieg bought one of yours and thats why they are ahead of the game form my opinion.
Yeah, and I know a guy who's brothers friend ran a turbo thru a Stage 5 and made like 980 hp. Word, look it up. :fart:
I got up our Stage 5 vs competitor port up tonight:
STIEGEMEIER SNAKE BITE vs COMPETITOR - Supercharger Q&A, Moderated by Dyno Bob
Bob is still out in the shop working. I have not seen him for me to ask him any questions that I am not qualified to answer.
As always feel free to call for any questions or concerns.
Thank you
Robyn S
636-949-2275
StiegeSplash
Again, I apologize for not having test 2 posted yesterday.
Regardless the chart clearly shows your IAT1's were colder than the Race Port at the start of the pull and then Hotter at the end of the pull than the Race Port.
Engine temps were by no means hot so that isn't a factor.
It's all there and rather easy to read.
19*'s increase for my Race Port compared to 34*/36*'s increase for your ports. I'll take the 19 any day of the week.
Thanks and I'm not going to argue with this.
The outlet is the part that will show the difference.What part of the blower porting attributes to the differences in the IAT2 temps?