Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
G.O.T. !!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="noco5.0" data-source="post: 16187958" data-attributes="member: 138474"><p>I was listening to Rush Limbaugh of all people and he was talking about how dark it was. I'm going to try watching it again and change my TV settings to theater. I think the compression issue mentioned by the cinematographer makes sense to so it probably is better the second time.</p><p><a href="https://www.indiewire.com/2019/04/game-of-thrones-cinematographer-show-too-dark-battle-winterfell-1202129682/" target="_blank">‘Game of Thrones’ Cinematographer Defends Battle of Winterfell Against Complaints It’s Too Dark to See</a> </p><p></p><p> As to the plot I thought it was kind of lame that no major characters died, but George RR Martin has said that he's more interested in the human story than the supernatural part. One of his criticisms of the Peter Jackson Lord of the Rings movies was that they just kind of ended after Sauron was destroyed where the book went into the scouring of the Shire by Sarumon. I've always found the Game of Thrones aspect of the show much more interesting than the whole Night King side show. I think the last three episodes are going to be epic and am glad the Night King part of the story has been put to rest. I just wonder what role Bran will have now since he doesn't seem to care about the human part of the story, but definitely had an interest in John Snow's true identity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="noco5.0, post: 16187958, member: 138474"] I was listening to Rush Limbaugh of all people and he was talking about how dark it was. I'm going to try watching it again and change my TV settings to theater. I think the compression issue mentioned by the cinematographer makes sense to so it probably is better the second time. [URL='https://www.indiewire.com/2019/04/game-of-thrones-cinematographer-show-too-dark-battle-winterfell-1202129682/']‘Game of Thrones’ Cinematographer Defends Battle of Winterfell Against Complaints It’s Too Dark to See[/URL] As to the plot I thought it was kind of lame that no major characters died, but George RR Martin has said that he's more interested in the human story than the supernatural part. One of his criticisms of the Peter Jackson Lord of the Rings movies was that they just kind of ended after Sauron was destroyed where the book went into the scouring of the Shire by Sarumon. I've always found the Game of Thrones aspect of the show much more interesting than the whole Night King side show. I think the last three episodes are going to be epic and am glad the Night King part of the story has been put to rest. I just wonder what role Bran will have now since he doesn't seem to care about the human part of the story, but definitely had an interest in John Snow's true identity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
G.O.T. !!!
Top