Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Other Fast Ford Vehicles
Marauder
Former MM.net Users
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="David Morton" data-source="post: 2841299" data-attributes="member: 30617"><p>Logan, thank you for your explanation here. I was pissed at you and apologize for my rude comments. Anger always clouds judgement. :bowdown: </p><p></p><p>I'm one of those people that expects that anybody who delegates authority to another person to act on his behalf should realise he is ultimately taking resposibility for that persons' actions taken on his behalf. So if you think my opinion of you was formed by another, blame Mercman. He was <strong>your</strong> choice to moderate, not mine. I'm supposing you can see that's where I was coming from, since you've offered an apology which I accept. No hard feelings? I hope not. I suggest you might consider requiring your moderators to show some documentation for their reason for banning somebody, since it is a drastic measure, and has resulted in this very situation we find ourselves in now. This would let the moderators know they <u><strong>have</strong></u> to apply <strong>your</strong> principles to a decision to ban somebody and not their <em>own</em> principles and just say they were using yours.</p><p></p><p>LightningLarry, <strong>you get it man!</strong> I take back what I said earlier about keeping this stuff off the site. I think the way you have provided a place for this type of political discussion at the smack down cafe is wise indeed. Trying to keep all politics off a car site these days is like trying to keep bird shit out of an uncovered pool. So many tiny pieces constantly being added, ad infinitum. Too much work! You've got the right idea here and I have no complaints. :thumbsup: </p><p></p><p>I know it looks like I deliberately used a stealthy method to insert political commentary on this thread. It was not my intention even if it was the result, and for that I apologize. My intention was to use the example of what happened to me over there to make a point about what I think isn't working for their benefit, and could be avoided here to make this a better site, more friendly to us Marauder owners and more profitable for the vendors.</p><p></p><p>Finally I'd like to add that Logan has unblocked me from his site, in spite of my ranting here. Logan, you've got big shoulders man, broader than mine. </p><p></p><p>I thank you Logan.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="David Morton, post: 2841299, member: 30617"] Logan, thank you for your explanation here. I was pissed at you and apologize for my rude comments. Anger always clouds judgement. :bowdown: I'm one of those people that expects that anybody who delegates authority to another person to act on his behalf should realise he is ultimately taking resposibility for that persons' actions taken on his behalf. So if you think my opinion of you was formed by another, blame Mercman. He was [B]your[/B] choice to moderate, not mine. I'm supposing you can see that's where I was coming from, since you've offered an apology which I accept. No hard feelings? I hope not. I suggest you might consider requiring your moderators to show some documentation for their reason for banning somebody, since it is a drastic measure, and has resulted in this very situation we find ourselves in now. This would let the moderators know they [U][B]have[/B][/U] to apply [B]your[/B] principles to a decision to ban somebody and not their [I]own[/I] principles and just say they were using yours. LightningLarry, [B]you get it man![/B] I take back what I said earlier about keeping this stuff off the site. I think the way you have provided a place for this type of political discussion at the smack down cafe is wise indeed. Trying to keep all politics off a car site these days is like trying to keep bird shit out of an uncovered pool. So many tiny pieces constantly being added, ad infinitum. Too much work! You've got the right idea here and I have no complaints. :thumbsup: I know it looks like I deliberately used a stealthy method to insert political commentary on this thread. It was not my intention even if it was the result, and for that I apologize. My intention was to use the example of what happened to me over there to make a point about what I think isn't working for their benefit, and could be avoided here to make this a better site, more friendly to us Marauder owners and more profitable for the vendors. Finally I'd like to add that Logan has unblocked me from his site, in spite of my ranting here. Logan, you've got big shoulders man, broader than mine. I thank you Logan. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Fast Ford Vehicles
Marauder
Former MM.net Users
Top