Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Ford Reveals Acceleration Times for 760-HP Mustang Shelby GT500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coiled03" data-source="post: 16314677" data-attributes="member: 18779"><p>Unfortunately for you, what you think "ought not be compromised" wasn't taken into consideration. If you think you can design a better car than them that still addresses what customers seem to want (e.g. safety, tech, etc..), knock yourself out.</p><p></p><p>If you're so into weight savings, why aren't you building a Fox body? They're lighter than SN95s.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coiled03, post: 16314677, member: 18779"] Unfortunately for you, what you think "ought not be compromised" wasn't taken into consideration. If you think you can design a better car than them that still addresses what customers seem to want (e.g. safety, tech, etc..), knock yourself out. If you're so into weight savings, why aren't you building a Fox body? They're lighter than SN95s. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Ford Reveals Acceleration Times for 760-HP Mustang Shelby GT500
Top