Ford Mustang GT500 vs Dodge Challenger
- Thread starter OKC03Cobra
- Start date
Well weight and gearing will play a big factor and the rumors of a 6.4 or 6.6 might even things up if they turn out ot be true, If they are the low-mid 30k range as estimated I may find myself in one, slower stock or not.
bubbrubb
New Member
I'd imagine that the dodge challenger forums would be guilty of being as idiodic as this very Shelby forum was before the car was actually produced.
Besides, if they can say 'just supercharge it' why can't we say 'throw on a set of twins'?
bench racing isn't like drinking games. nobody is a winner.
Besides, if they can say 'just supercharge it' why can't we say 'throw on a set of twins'?
bench racing isn't like drinking games. nobody is a winner.
BrookhavenTuner said:
For 30k You'll find Yourself in the V6 CHALLENGER.
6.4 or 6.6, if it happens, will be MSRP 45k+ and 4100lb Minimum.
07 Shelby said:
Do you mean to tell me they are going to have to endure a bunch of whiney ass internet cry babies bitching about how expensive and heavy the new Challenger is going to be!??!!
Those poor bastards!!! :smmon:
;-) :lol:
Can we close this thread until the car actually comes out? :bash:
Well, since we don't know any #'s on the Challenger yet, it's hard to say. But if it comes with the 6.4 and they can keep the weight down, I think it'll be a good race between the two. And I don't see the Challenger being 4100lbs, it's a two door and it's six inches shorter than the Charger, which weighs about 4K.
ac427cobra said:
Captain Beyond said:
PSI87
Banned
LS7 Camaro > all
bad360rt said:
This is exactly what is being Speculated. Yes, I know Speculated! Take it for what it's worth. How heavy do you think a 6.6L Cast Iron Block will weigh in at?
The Challenger is Shorter than the Charger, but it's Wider.
Besides, with a 6.4L or 6.6L, do you not think that Daimler will have the same F/R Weight distribution issue that the Shelby has?
Challenger Width....... 78.6 inches
Charger Width........... 74.5 inches
Last edited:
ac427cobra said:Do you mean to tell me they are going to have to endure a bunch of whiney ass internet cry babies bitching about how expensive and heavy the new Challenger is going to be!??!!
Those poor bastards!!! :smmon:
;-) :lol:
Ya Don't Think?!?
It has definitely Started........... oke: :banana: !!!
Last edited:
PSI87 said:
i would not be so sure. the ls7 part, not the part about the ss camaro owning all.
ON D BIT said:i would not be so sure. the ls7 part, not the part about the ss camaro owning all.
True, I dont think the LS7 was ever stated to actually BE in the Camaro, just a few hopefulls posting about it.
Yup, speculating sucks! LOL I'm just hoping they can keep the weight down, and give it 500+hp. But I guess we just have to wait and see. Of course, by the time they hit the streets it'll be impossible to find a stock GT500 :thumbsup:07 Shelby said:
I agree, though it may be a bit less than 4.1k#'s.07 Shelby said:
And one thing that's really going to put a damper on the Dodges is that good tuning software for them is practically nonexistant. This is the reason you don't see KB'd hemi's running around.
SID297 said:
Tell me about it. I had no idea they were running speed density until recently either. Trying to find quality software or a tuner is a laughing matter. :shrug:
Fourcam330 said:
I discovered Dodge was still speed density when the SRT-10 Ram came out. In this day in age speed density is a joke.
Uhhhh
There isn't going to be any surprises when it comes to the challenger. The srt model is going to be the same one that's in the charger and 300c srt 8. Its going to be 40k sticker. Its also not going to be markedly faster than the other cars either.
There isn't going to be any surprises when it comes to the challenger. The srt model is going to be the same one that's in the charger and 300c srt 8. Its going to be 40k sticker. Its also not going to be markedly faster than the other cars either.
PSI87 said:
:lol:
Not in a 4000 lb camaro :-D
Users who are viewing this thread
