Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Fathers proven not to be paternal father but still owing child support
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SVT4ME" data-source="post: 5975907" data-attributes="member: 7467"><p>Was watching Dr Phil this week and the show was about fathers finding out that their not the father of their children. The twist was it was years after the divorce and they all found out after court ordered child support. They would petition the court to stop child support payments but in all cases it was denied. One mother even got the court to cut out visitation and force the father to still pay. In that case the father had told the child the truth and was kind of cruel on how it explained it. How wrong is this? Gloria Allred was a guest on sided with the mothers. I just wanted to slap the taste out of her mouth. They had a no-name attorney representing the guys and his argument was this is the perfect crime. The mother lies and after DNA sides with the father it still doesn't make any difference. Even murders are set free after DNA is given to support their innocence. Am I missing something?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SVT4ME, post: 5975907, member: 7467"] Was watching Dr Phil this week and the show was about fathers finding out that their not the father of their children. The twist was it was years after the divorce and they all found out after court ordered child support. They would petition the court to stop child support payments but in all cases it was denied. One mother even got the court to cut out visitation and force the father to still pay. In that case the father had told the child the truth and was kind of cruel on how it explained it. How wrong is this? Gloria Allred was a guest on sided with the mothers. I just wanted to slap the taste out of her mouth. They had a no-name attorney representing the guys and his argument was this is the perfect crime. The mother lies and after DNA sides with the father it still doesn't make any difference. Even murders are set free after DNA is given to support their innocence. Am I missing something? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Fathers proven not to be paternal father but still owing child support
Top