Does a 3" catback really make any difference over a 2.5"?

MalcolmV8

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
7,353
Location
Tampa, FL
See what I mean by driveshaft access

IMG_6523.JPG
 

Gamer2Cars

For the Horse
Established Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
119
Location
Denver
Yeah, it's terrible. But hey, if your safety loop doesn't catch it in the event of a failure, your exhaust sure as hell will!
 

mod mod t56

u can go faster
Established Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
461
Location
ft worth
I did this on a eaton set up.... custom 2.5 x pipe and Maga flo cat back .... went to a jba shorty flo mater off road x pipe and jba 3 c cat back .... at a 520 hp I lost power it seemed to bog and not as torquey ....same set up but with a whipple....580 @17 and 710 @24 on e85...pulls hard on the top but not real crisp down low .... I think 3" dose not have enough back pressure till u start hitting big boost or high hp
 

MalcolmV8

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
7,353
Location
Tampa, FL
I did this on a eaton set up.... custom 2.5 x pipe and Maga flo cat back .... went to a jba shorty flo mater off road x pipe and jba 3 c cat back .... at a 520 hp I lost power it seemed to bog and not as torquey ....same set up but with a whipple....580 @17 and 710 @24 on e85...pulls hard on the top but not real crisp down low .... I think 3" dose not have enough back pressure till u start hitting big boost or high hp

I would almost guess something else is responsible for your car not feeling real crisp down low. I have 1 7/8 long tubes, 3" o/r X and 3" cat back and can't tell the slightest bit of difference in how it drives down low. Honestly I'd need a dyno and swap between 2.5" X and catback and the 3" to see what the differences are and where each one is better.
 

Woody6799

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Messages
3,594
Location
New Jersey
I would almost guess something else is responsible for your car not feeling real crisp down low. I have 1 7/8 long tubes, 3" o/r X and 3" cat back and can't tell the slightest bit of difference in how it drives down low. Honestly I'd need a dyno and swap between 2.5" X and catback and the 3" to see what the differences are and where each one is better.

I did alot of research on this when I bought my Kooks headers and found a bunch of articles relating back pressure and power. Ultimately, I found that 1 7/8 was too much flow for an eaton set up and COULD have negative effects. I eventually went with a 1 5/8 to 2.5 set up which has shown not to be a restriction until the mid 7's, which is more than my set up will ever see.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top