Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Documentary: The Unbelievers (Official Trailer)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wurd2" data-source="post: 13038225" data-attributes="member: 15196"><p>98SVTContour98, it appears that Daniel Come sympathizes with Craig's justification of genocide and the murder of innocent children. How disgusting.</p><p></p><p>Daniel Come is also *wrong* as to why Richard Dawkins does not infer there to be an intelligent designer. It's called <em>a complete lack of evidence</em> Mr. Come, first and foremost. Dawkins does *not* leverage the infinite regression problem of an intelligent designer to dismiss such a case.</p><p></p><p>Why can't any of Dawkins' religious critics get his arguments right? Perhaps they don't actually read his material? Or maybe they are too busy watching Ben Stein interviews, cut and edited into misrepresentation.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: black">.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wurd2, post: 13038225, member: 15196"] 98SVTContour98, it appears that Daniel Come sympathizes with Craig's justification of genocide and the murder of innocent children. How disgusting. Daniel Come is also *wrong* as to why Richard Dawkins does not infer there to be an intelligent designer. It's called [i]a complete lack of evidence[/i] Mr. Come, first and foremost. Dawkins does *not* leverage the infinite regression problem of an intelligent designer to dismiss such a case. Why can't any of Dawkins' religious critics get his arguments right? Perhaps they don't actually read his material? Or maybe they are too busy watching Ben Stein interviews, cut and edited into misrepresentation. [color=black].[/color] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Documentary: The Unbelievers (Official Trailer)
Top