I used to administer a $100 mech/electrical test for prospective employees, I found that "most" fell into two groups.
Group A: Had the requisite understanding of mechanical and or electrical principles and aptitude (10%)
Group B: Had no idea of even how a toaster worked. (80%)
Now I ask simple questions before we buy a test. The following are REAL questions and answers in interviews:
APPLICANT STATED THEY HAVE A MECHANICAL APTITUDE
Q: You drove here today in a Honda?
A: Yes
Q: Do you know how many cylinders your Honda's engine has?
A: 4
Q: Do you know what is inside each cylinder?
A: Is this part of the job I am applying for?
Q: No, not really but it gives me an idea of what you know
A: No, I don't know what is in each cylinder..
Q: A piston
A: I was going to say that!
APPLICANT STATED THEY HAVE A ELECTRCAL APTITUDE
Q: See that outlet over there?
A: yes
Q: Do you know how many volts are typical of an outlet?
A: yes, 400 amps
Q: No, there are not 400 amps, and I asked about volts
A: It's the same thing
Q; No it's not (chuckle)
A: I do not mean to be smart, but it has 400 amps
Q: Thanks for coming in...
Back on topic.
You can ask all the questions you want, but you can not read minds. People can mislead you, and they can have an agenda.
My point above is that there is a liability to hiring a woman into a position where the owner (by the nature of the work) could be accused without evidence or corroboration. My experience is that simply being accused is damaging. I don't think most owners will state it, but it would not surprise me that #metoo ends up hurting women's employment opportunities.
E
Group A: Had the requisite understanding of mechanical and or electrical principles and aptitude (10%)
Group B: Had no idea of even how a toaster worked. (80%)
Now I ask simple questions before we buy a test. The following are REAL questions and answers in interviews:
APPLICANT STATED THEY HAVE A MECHANICAL APTITUDE
Q: You drove here today in a Honda?
A: Yes
Q: Do you know how many cylinders your Honda's engine has?
A: 4
Q: Do you know what is inside each cylinder?
A: Is this part of the job I am applying for?
Q: No, not really but it gives me an idea of what you know
A: No, I don't know what is in each cylinder..
Q: A piston
A: I was going to say that!
APPLICANT STATED THEY HAVE A ELECTRCAL APTITUDE
Q: See that outlet over there?
A: yes
Q: Do you know how many volts are typical of an outlet?
A: yes, 400 amps
Q: No, there are not 400 amps, and I asked about volts
A: It's the same thing
Q; No it's not (chuckle)
A: I do not mean to be smart, but it has 400 amps
Q: Thanks for coming in...
Back on topic.
You can ask all the questions you want, but you can not read minds. People can mislead you, and they can have an agenda.
My point above is that there is a liability to hiring a woman into a position where the owner (by the nature of the work) could be accused without evidence or corroboration. My experience is that simply being accused is damaging. I don't think most owners will state it, but it would not surprise me that #metoo ends up hurting women's employment opportunities.
E