Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2015+ Shelby GT350 Mustang
CJ manifold and E85, who has most NA power?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sumfoo1" data-source="post: 16012428" data-attributes="member: 179176"><p>Its not just serious its factually how the stuff works man. i'm not saying lets compare it as a 3.1 liter... (unless comparing to a wankle cause that damned thing is effectively a 2 stroke [nostroke]) i'm just saying at 100% volumetric efficiency... that's all she eats in a single revolution so it takes cramming more air than that into the engine to create boost. Whomever said you add blower displacement to engine displacement was factually incorrect. Other than efficiency a positive displacement supercharger with the same drive ratio (pulley sizes) will try to make the same hp on whatever engine you put it on for as long as the engine will hold it..... that's how a positive displacement supercharger works... not some add the displacement to what you already have phooey. Basically what i'm saying is, bolt that same blower on a honda with the same pulleys and its going to try to cram the same 5.664 liters of air into the engine and make how ever much boost it needs to to get that in there until the engine blows... Anyway back to fords! </p><p></p><p>What does the CJ, long tubes, off road x pipe combo make... the world needs to know. </p><p></p><p>it's a real shame no one is making even larger cams for these... i guess the market base isn't big enough to support it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sumfoo1, post: 16012428, member: 179176"] Its not just serious its factually how the stuff works man. i'm not saying lets compare it as a 3.1 liter... (unless comparing to a wankle cause that damned thing is effectively a 2 stroke [nostroke]) i'm just saying at 100% volumetric efficiency... that's all she eats in a single revolution so it takes cramming more air than that into the engine to create boost. Whomever said you add blower displacement to engine displacement was factually incorrect. Other than efficiency a positive displacement supercharger with the same drive ratio (pulley sizes) will try to make the same hp on whatever engine you put it on for as long as the engine will hold it..... that's how a positive displacement supercharger works... not some add the displacement to what you already have phooey. Basically what i'm saying is, bolt that same blower on a honda with the same pulleys and its going to try to cram the same 5.664 liters of air into the engine and make how ever much boost it needs to to get that in there until the engine blows... Anyway back to fords! What does the CJ, long tubes, off road x pipe combo make... the world needs to know. it's a real shame no one is making even larger cams for these... i guess the market base isn't big enough to support it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2015+ Shelby GT350 Mustang
CJ manifold and E85, who has most NA power?
Top