Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Case involving home damage from SWAT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevins89notch" data-source="post: 16315988" data-attributes="member: 31255"><p>Home before: [MEDIA=imgur]I1AhDJg[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>Home after: [MEDIA=imgur]JcbwKIF[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>In regards to the insurance company, I'm just going to copy/paste what someone said on Reddit because they perfectly summed it up.....</p><p></p><p>It covered the cost of repairing the house. Insurance isn't going to build you a nicer, bigger, house when yours is repairable for far less. This is how things work. If my 2012 Camry is in a collision my insurance is going to give me money to repair it or replace with a similar 2012 car, they're not going to just buy me a brand new BMW.</p><p></p><p>He drove up his costs immensely by choosing to demolish the house, rip out the foundation, and lay in a far larger one to put in a much nicer house</p><p></p><p>This guy would have been made whole by his insurance, but it looks like he gambled on an additional payout from police and tried to use the incident to enrich himself.</p><p></p><p>I think there's plenty of argument to be made that police should have shared liability for that $345,000 with insurance to pay for repairing the building to its original state before they went Hot Fuzz on it, but it seems off to me for him to argue he was owed hundreds of thousands more to go above and beyond repairs and build a whole different building</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevins89notch, post: 16315988, member: 31255"] Home before: [MEDIA=imgur]I1AhDJg[/MEDIA] Home after: [MEDIA=imgur]JcbwKIF[/MEDIA] In regards to the insurance company, I'm just going to copy/paste what someone said on Reddit because they perfectly summed it up..... It covered the cost of repairing the house. Insurance isn't going to build you a nicer, bigger, house when yours is repairable for far less. This is how things work. If my 2012 Camry is in a collision my insurance is going to give me money to repair it or replace with a similar 2012 car, they're not going to just buy me a brand new BMW. He drove up his costs immensely by choosing to demolish the house, rip out the foundation, and lay in a far larger one to put in a much nicer house This guy would have been made whole by his insurance, but it looks like he gambled on an additional payout from police and tried to use the incident to enrich himself. I think there's plenty of argument to be made that police should have shared liability for that $345,000 with insurance to pay for repairing the building to its original state before they went Hot Fuzz on it, but it seems off to me for him to argue he was owed hundreds of thousands more to go above and beyond repairs and build a whole different building [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Case involving home damage from SWAT
Top