Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Case involving home damage from SWAT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="svtfocus2cobra" data-source="post: 16315583" data-attributes="member: 21786"><p>Should be on the insurance company imo. If the liability is going to fall on the police department and the city then they will inevitably place restrictions on how the PD and SWAT can conduct operations in situations like these and certain tactics that can lead to destruction would be ruled out resulting in possibly more dangerous situations for police officers and bystanders. Not every tactic is going to be the best choice but in those situations you use the resources you have available to stop the threat by all means, so you can't have those limited because the city is afraid of having to pay for the damages done. </p><p></p><p>Or at least it should be reviewed afterwards in case the destruction goes overboard and it is proven by other experts in the field that SWAT went overboard in their assault and used overly destructive tactics that weren't necessary or normal for the situation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="svtfocus2cobra, post: 16315583, member: 21786"] Should be on the insurance company imo. If the liability is going to fall on the police department and the city then they will inevitably place restrictions on how the PD and SWAT can conduct operations in situations like these and certain tactics that can lead to destruction would be ruled out resulting in possibly more dangerous situations for police officers and bystanders. Not every tactic is going to be the best choice but in those situations you use the resources you have available to stop the threat by all means, so you can't have those limited because the city is afraid of having to pay for the damages done. Or at least it should be reviewed afterwards in case the destruction goes overboard and it is proven by other experts in the field that SWAT went overboard in their assault and used overly destructive tactics that weren't necessary or normal for the situation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Case involving home damage from SWAT
Top