Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
California - Nitrous.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Om3ga47" data-source="post: 7471598" data-attributes="member: 32782"><p>27165(b) is what the officer sited. I must ask,how can a modification to a vehicle,that is non functional what so ever be sited for effecting my emissions system?</p><p></p><p>A turbo or Supercharger can be illegal since it in fact replaces the factory intake system and in some cases reroutes the emissions system. At this very moment and at the time of citing...the system was disconnected and inactive. How can a series of lines that are sealed and not disrupting the intake system/emissions systems be cited under such a section? I understand you are officers and I appreciate the input...but come on guys,you have to understand my argument...this makes NO SENSE,only reason I continue this is to have an arguement with LEO's who understand automotive. Noone has given me a solid answer...An officer would not ticket me for having a rubber hose on my intake that is sealed off and going nowhere. Why would this system at the moment be illegal if it is not doing one solitary thing to the induction system or being used as a performance inhibitor on the street. I have searched CVC and still have found NO section what so ever stating a nitrous system is illegal. CARB number or not...a CARB number is necessary for a modification that is at use and continuously acts on the running state of an engine. The ARB or CARB in CA has also proved these systems do not effect the emissions system. So the fact there is no law WRITTEN against it,and it has been WRITTEN by the same Bureau who wrote these laws that "Nitrous systems do not reduce the performance of a vehicles emissions system" how is this justified under 27165(b) and how is it illegal?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Om3ga47, post: 7471598, member: 32782"] 27165(b) is what the officer sited. I must ask,how can a modification to a vehicle,that is non functional what so ever be sited for effecting my emissions system? A turbo or Supercharger can be illegal since it in fact replaces the factory intake system and in some cases reroutes the emissions system. At this very moment and at the time of citing...the system was disconnected and inactive. How can a series of lines that are sealed and not disrupting the intake system/emissions systems be cited under such a section? I understand you are officers and I appreciate the input...but come on guys,you have to understand my argument...this makes NO SENSE,only reason I continue this is to have an arguement with LEO's who understand automotive. Noone has given me a solid answer...An officer would not ticket me for having a rubber hose on my intake that is sealed off and going nowhere. Why would this system at the moment be illegal if it is not doing one solitary thing to the induction system or being used as a performance inhibitor on the street. I have searched CVC and still have found NO section what so ever stating a nitrous system is illegal. CARB number or not...a CARB number is necessary for a modification that is at use and continuously acts on the running state of an engine. The ARB or CARB in CA has also proved these systems do not effect the emissions system. So the fact there is no law WRITTEN against it,and it has been WRITTEN by the same Bureau who wrote these laws that "Nitrous systems do not reduce the performance of a vehicles emissions system" how is this justified under 27165(b) and how is it illegal? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
California - Nitrous.
Top