Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Calif. bill to pay NCAA athletes takes another step
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Corbic" data-source="post: 16287160" data-attributes="member: 171475"><p>You realize giving "free tuition" is practically a sunk cost to the school, right? 35 vs 36 kids in a class makes no difference.</p><p></p><p>Also, so the kid is getting "$35k a year in perks" but his individual revenue generation for the school maybe in excess of $1m a year.</p><p></p><p>Also, read the bill, which is not saying the schools have to pay these kids a salary. Rather, the kids have the right to profit from their workand talent. Why should a student athlete not be aloud to sell his jersey or autographs, get paid for a speaking engagemrnt, fund raiser or dinner? Why should they not be all alloud to sign advertising contractors or sponsorships? </p><p></p><p>They have every right to capitalize on their fame and success. Schools are apoosed because at their fundamental core they are communist institutions. </p><p></p><p>You know who also got free room and board? Farm slaves in the 19th century when they were picking cotton.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Corbic, post: 16287160, member: 171475"] You realize giving "free tuition" is practically a sunk cost to the school, right? 35 vs 36 kids in a class makes no difference. Also, so the kid is getting "$35k a year in perks" but his individual revenue generation for the school maybe in excess of $1m a year. Also, read the bill, which is not saying the schools have to pay these kids a salary. Rather, the kids have the right to profit from their workand talent. Why should a student athlete not be aloud to sell his jersey or autographs, get paid for a speaking engagemrnt, fund raiser or dinner? Why should they not be all alloud to sign advertising contractors or sponsorships? They have every right to capitalize on their fame and success. Schools are apoosed because at their fundamental core they are communist institutions. You know who also got free room and board? Farm slaves in the 19th century when they were picking cotton. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Calif. bill to pay NCAA athletes takes another step
Top