Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Best Sportsbike 600cc and up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Suck_it_MysticZ" data-source="post: 16963145" data-attributes="member: 141765"><p>My 1997 put down 117 on the dyno. It had a bit of lurching at times down low, combination of first year tuning and the clutch being different, if my memory serves me correctly. I rode a later TLS and it felt a little softer all around. Still fun but the top end felt a smidge less sharp.</p><p></p><p>Rode the TLR, Honda Superhawk, and the RC51. Only bike I would have traded for would have been was an SP2, version. Mainly the black/gray it looked absolutely beautiful. </p><p></p><p>Back to the topic. Best for the money, to me, starts with intended purpose. Best for the money for a new 600cc is a different category than best vintage naked bike from the 90's. </p><p></p><p>Pick a purpose. Set a price range. Go shopping. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I'd rather that old Crayola Fizzer vs a pedestrian 2003 blue/white R6. BUT, if I wanted to go do a track day that R6 probably would be the ticket. Cheap, plentiful used parts, and from my experience, very easy to ride quickly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Suck_it_MysticZ, post: 16963145, member: 141765"] My 1997 put down 117 on the dyno. It had a bit of lurching at times down low, combination of first year tuning and the clutch being different, if my memory serves me correctly. I rode a later TLS and it felt a little softer all around. Still fun but the top end felt a smidge less sharp. Rode the TLR, Honda Superhawk, and the RC51. Only bike I would have traded for would have been was an SP2, version. Mainly the black/gray it looked absolutely beautiful. Back to the topic. Best for the money, to me, starts with intended purpose. Best for the money for a new 600cc is a different category than best vintage naked bike from the 90's. Pick a purpose. Set a price range. Go shopping. :) I'd rather that old Crayola Fizzer vs a pedestrian 2003 blue/white R6. BUT, if I wanted to go do a track day that R6 probably would be the ticket. Cheap, plentiful used parts, and from my experience, very easy to ride quickly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Best Sportsbike 600cc and up
Top