Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
base fines?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="svtcop" data-source="post: 11660732" data-attributes="member: 74339"><p>The officer stopped the vehicle with him driving it, hence the no DL on person charge. Seems pretty cut and dry there. They stopped the car due to reports of a reckless driver who had possibly struck a sign was leaving the scene of an accident. That is cause to stop a vehicle that fits the description in the area. </p><p></p><p>As far as the reckless charge, I think you misread. That wasn't him charged with that. It was his friend. So there is nothing for him to challenge there. The Officer stopped HIM driving the car suspected of causing damage/driving recklessly in the area. Again, that's a good stop. I'm sure his buddy admitted to the police for being responsible for driving at the time of the burnout, which is why he was cited. :read:</p><p></p><p>If you read all 750 pages certainly you read this code. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/807.570" target="_blank">ORS 807.570 - Failure to carry or present license - 2011 Oregon Revised Statutes</a></p><p></p><p>Wherein it states that a violation of this code is a class c misdemeanor. </p><p></p><p>A class c misdemeanor in Oregon. I posted the section in my first post. Oregon law reads really easy compared to some states (including Ohio) </p><p></p><p>OP, can you post what specific code you are charged with? Do you have a mandatory court appearance? You may be confused as to what you are charged with. Post the specific code you violated. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Didn't I just say that? :dw:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How can you be so sure that it will be dropped? Under his own admission he was not in possession of he DL. He really needs counsel present during court proceedings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="svtcop, post: 11660732, member: 74339"] The officer stopped the vehicle with him driving it, hence the no DL on person charge. Seems pretty cut and dry there. They stopped the car due to reports of a reckless driver who had possibly struck a sign was leaving the scene of an accident. That is cause to stop a vehicle that fits the description in the area. As far as the reckless charge, I think you misread. That wasn't him charged with that. It was his friend. So there is nothing for him to challenge there. The Officer stopped HIM driving the car suspected of causing damage/driving recklessly in the area. Again, that's a good stop. I'm sure his buddy admitted to the police for being responsible for driving at the time of the burnout, which is why he was cited. :read: If you read all 750 pages certainly you read this code. [url=http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/807.570]ORS 807.570 - Failure to carry or present license - 2011 Oregon Revised Statutes[/url] Wherein it states that a violation of this code is a class c misdemeanor. A class c misdemeanor in Oregon. I posted the section in my first post. Oregon law reads really easy compared to some states (including Ohio) OP, can you post what specific code you are charged with? Do you have a mandatory court appearance? You may be confused as to what you are charged with. Post the specific code you violated. Didn't I just say that? :dw: How can you be so sure that it will be dropped? Under his own admission he was not in possession of he DL. He really needs counsel present during court proceedings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
base fines?
Top