http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/0...n-collides-with-merchant-ship-in-pacific.html
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Couldn't be any worse than the woods hole passage.The collision with the fitz was the ships fault. Period. The firings and discipline has happened, and the post collision report is out.
This collision, based on the flooding damage, was in the aft part of the ship. It occurred in one of the busiest traffic schemes in the world. I will wait until I see more info to pass judgement. As sailor who has stood the conn on the bridge, and stood in combat as a watch officer and surface warfare coordinator, the straits of Malacca are no ****ing joke.
Steer themselves? Have your actually stood watch on a ddg in the straits? I have. Nothing in the straits is automated.with today's technology, it's a ****ing joke. Those ships basically steer themselves. I don't care how "busy" it may be, don't run a ship if you can't do the ****ing job.
Technically this is 4...Once is a incident, twice is a trend...I wouldn't be surprised to see some higher up PF heads roll after this one.
Technically this is 4...
Correct.Yep, one ran aground and another hit a fishing boat right?
I meant 4 in that area recentlyDo you count subs?
The US Navy does not have control issue. Shit happens. Fault will be assessed, discipline will occur and the process will be improved.
Prayers to the families of the missing, may they find peace.