Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
9.5 aluminator vs 11to1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bud" data-source="post: 13830077" data-attributes="member: 125446"><p>Was logged effective timing the same between both setups? Curious if maf counts were the same between the two as well to give a little more data where one might be more efficient than the other (as long as the tune was the exact same). Also, same dyno?</p><p></p><p>That would be interesting data to review. Definitely interesting results you guys are having, especially the blower results. Guess IAT's would be part of the equation as well...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bud, post: 13830077, member: 125446"] Was logged effective timing the same between both setups? Curious if maf counts were the same between the two as well to give a little more data where one might be more efficient than the other (as long as the tune was the exact same). Also, same dyno? That would be interesting data to review. Definitely interesting results you guys are having, especially the blower results. Guess IAT's would be part of the equation as well... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
9.5 aluminator vs 11to1
Top