Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
3.4 Whipple VS Gen 3 2.65
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CD07GT500" data-source="post: 16351959" data-attributes="member: 195665"><p>I wanted to post this comparison awhile back but never got around to it. Yes these combos are not identical but they share a lot of the same major components as seen below. This is honest non bias results with both combos using the same engine builder, tuner, and dyno. Honestly I never expected my 2.65 combo to make more than 1080.</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Gen 2 3.4 Crusher Whipple </strong></p><p><strong>25lbs </strong></p><p><strong>MMP Custom grinds </strong></p><p><strong>Fox Lake ported heads </strong></p><p><strong>10:1 </strong></p><p><strong>ARH 1.875x3" Headers </strong></p><p><strong>ARH 3" exhaust. </strong></p><p><strong>CJ T/B</strong></p><p><strong>JLT 148 </strong></p><p><strong>E85 </strong></p><p><strong>3.73s/Street tires </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>3.4 Whipple (SAE was right at 1000)</strong></p><p><strong>1031/913 STD</strong></p><p><strong>[ATTACH=full]1619209[/ATTACH] </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p> <strong>Gen 3 2.65 (Non R with no port work) </strong></p><p> <strong>25lbs</strong></p><p><strong>Custom grinds </strong></p><p><strong>ported heads</strong></p><p><strong>10.7:1 </strong></p><p><strong>Kooks 2"x3.5" Headers </strong></p><p><strong>Kooks 3.5" exhaust. </strong></p><p><strong>VMP 173 T/B</strong></p><p><strong>JLT 148</strong></p><p><strong>E85</strong></p><p><strong>4.10s/30" drag radials</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p> <strong>VMP 2.65</strong></p><p><strong>1215/1101 SAE </strong></p><p><strong>[ATTACH=full]1619210[/ATTACH] </strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CD07GT500, post: 16351959, member: 195665"] I wanted to post this comparison awhile back but never got around to it. Yes these combos are not identical but they share a lot of the same major components as seen below. This is honest non bias results with both combos using the same engine builder, tuner, and dyno. Honestly I never expected my 2.65 combo to make more than 1080. [b] Gen 2 3.4 Crusher Whipple 25lbs MMP Custom grinds Fox Lake ported heads 10:1 ARH 1.875x3" Headers ARH 3" exhaust. CJ T/B JLT 148 E85 3.73s/Street tires 3.4 Whipple (SAE was right at 1000) 1031/913 STD [ATTACH=full]1619209[/ATTACH] Gen 3 2.65 (Non R with no port work) 25lbs Custom grinds ported heads 10.7:1 Kooks 2"x3.5" Headers Kooks 3.5" exhaust. VMP 173 T/B JLT 148 E85 4.10s/30" drag radials VMP 2.65 1215/1101 SAE [ATTACH=full]1619210[/ATTACH] [/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SVT Shelby GT500
3.4 Whipple VS Gen 3 2.65
Top