Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
2002 Ford Thunderbird | Retro Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kevinatfms" data-source="post: 16796074" data-attributes="member: 39344"><p>I loved/hated these depending on the owner. If they did their maintenance and kept it garaged/clean the things wouldnt require a ton of deep repairs. The abused/neglected ones were a royal nightmare to work on.</p><p></p><p>Owners either took exceptional care of them or let them rot. </p><p></p><p>Highs:</p><p>The 3.9L DOHC was beyond amazing. 300hp and the thing absolutely purred around town and on the highway. Not super fast but felt matched to the car.</p><p></p><p>The exhaust note while cruising was awesome. They had these dual exhaust with an h-pipe after the mufflers which changed the sound quite a bit. </p><p></p><p>They got surprisingly good gas mileage for a small V8 in a somewhat heavier coupe. IIRC they could knock off low 20's quite easy in the city and mid to high 20s on the highway. </p><p></p><p>True cruiser of a car and almost no odd NVH issues like the Mustang. They were extremely relaxing to drive and the quality of the materials used was more than premium.</p><p></p><p>Seats were great for the occasional nap while work was slow. More comfortable than most of the SUVs and large Ford cars. Again, super comfortable.</p><p></p><p>Lows:</p><p>The hydraulic engine cooling fan was beyond idiotic. They also failed at an alarming rate. Jaguar used the same stupid design and it caused so many headaches. </p><p></p><p>3.9L was absolutely crammed into place. Trying to do any motor work required skinny ass arms or pulling everything apart far deeper than you really wanted to go. This also lead to the coilpacks being right under the cowl area. They had a recall/TSB to add foam into the cowl area but it was only good for so long before it would leak again and cause misfires.</p><p></p><p>The rear mounted battery and trunk release. So many owners would let the battery die then would have the car towed in because they didnt know about the trunk release button behind the drivers seat. I think Ford finally made the button yellow so people could see it.</p><p></p><p>There was also some very odd electrical issues due to the QC related to the car. Bad grounds, splices and the occasional PCM issue were very hard to diagnose. The MAFs were also another electrical item that would go bad at random causing hard starts, no starts or other wacky codes. Same as the Lincoln LS issues.</p><p></p><p>Wheels used to peel the chrome coating. I know they recalled/TSB issued on the flaking chrome to be replaced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kevinatfms, post: 16796074, member: 39344"] I loved/hated these depending on the owner. If they did their maintenance and kept it garaged/clean the things wouldnt require a ton of deep repairs. The abused/neglected ones were a royal nightmare to work on. Owners either took exceptional care of them or let them rot. Highs: The 3.9L DOHC was beyond amazing. 300hp and the thing absolutely purred around town and on the highway. Not super fast but felt matched to the car. The exhaust note while cruising was awesome. They had these dual exhaust with an h-pipe after the mufflers which changed the sound quite a bit. They got surprisingly good gas mileage for a small V8 in a somewhat heavier coupe. IIRC they could knock off low 20's quite easy in the city and mid to high 20s on the highway. True cruiser of a car and almost no odd NVH issues like the Mustang. They were extremely relaxing to drive and the quality of the materials used was more than premium. Seats were great for the occasional nap while work was slow. More comfortable than most of the SUVs and large Ford cars. Again, super comfortable. Lows: The hydraulic engine cooling fan was beyond idiotic. They also failed at an alarming rate. Jaguar used the same stupid design and it caused so many headaches. 3.9L was absolutely crammed into place. Trying to do any motor work required skinny ass arms or pulling everything apart far deeper than you really wanted to go. This also lead to the coilpacks being right under the cowl area. They had a recall/TSB to add foam into the cowl area but it was only good for so long before it would leak again and cause misfires. The rear mounted battery and trunk release. So many owners would let the battery die then would have the car towed in because they didnt know about the trunk release button behind the drivers seat. I think Ford finally made the button yellow so people could see it. There was also some very odd electrical issues due to the QC related to the car. Bad grounds, splices and the occasional PCM issue were very hard to diagnose. The MAFs were also another electrical item that would go bad at random causing hard starts, no starts or other wacky codes. Same as the Lincoln LS issues. Wheels used to peel the chrome coating. I know they recalled/TSB issued on the flaking chrome to be replaced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
2002 Ford Thunderbird | Retro Review
Top