Search results

*1215

See the reply above from Bj.

Gen 2 makes more power period. The 2.3 is the better option in some cases.

TTT

Gen2 might be the better option if he had a lower power goal.

Need it gone make me an offer.

TTT

I made 1215/1100 with the standard version. Lund made 1127 with the standard Gen 3. Lund made 1262/1035SAE with the Gen3R SS. So it does make sense that he had a inlet restriction holding his combo back based off what Lunds similar combo made.

The SS is a modified version of the Gen3 R that VMP sells so that would be off the shelf. My point is based off the gains from swapping to a better intake it seems as if the 2.65 was being held back as well since it actually made more power than the 3.8 with the 148.

The other question is would the 2.65 make 1250 with the better intake as well. I would like to see the 148 3.8 vs 148 2.65 graph.

Ttt

Ttt

Lol....

VMP 173mm T/B with ported adapter plate and gasket. This is the revised version of the 173. $400 shipped OBO

Standard inlet 4.5 is garbage.

Just like any other car it will take a good amount of $.

Over 2.5” x-pipe was with no cats.

The gains will be about 25whp with a 650-700hp combo with 1 7/8x3”.

YouTube? That combo should make 1200+ all day. You put your car on the dyno after the 2.65R?

What’s the goal for this combo Gen3R/ported heads/cams/10.5:1. 1250?

No the 3.4 actually had more timing in it IIRC.

Taking the 5th gen to TX2K?

The 3.8 should be capable of maxing out ID1300s. I would stick with the ID1700s.

Less the better.

Yea sure. Both on e85 cut with race gas out of a drum. Ignite 114 Red and One E. Both combos got the maximum timing based off plug readings on the dyno. The Temp and humidity was slightly warmer for the whipple pull but the correction factor will account for the majority of that.