2013-2014 availability and values

Norton

Long-time SVT Enthusiast
Established Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
3,167
Location
Colorado Springs, CO
What are the numbers on the Mach E GT performance metric?
LOL! I can only guess what the troll said, based on your question, but according to Ford...

1.JPG


- 480 HORSEPOWER = EPIC FAIL
- 634 LB.-FT. TORQUE = WIN (by 3 LB.-FT.)
- 0–60 IN 3.5 SECONDS = TIE
- No 1/4-mile time listed, but 0–60 indicates a possible TIE and more likely FAIL
- No top speed listed, but other sources claim "at least 130 MPH," pointing to another EPIC FAIL
- Tipping the scales at over 1000 lbs heavier, it's certain handling will be another EPIC FAIL

In addition to our cars having better performance in almost every measurable way, there's also the fact that the Mach E is an abomination for which Ford should not have defiled the Mustang name.
 
Last edited:

Dragfan

Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2021
Messages
59
Location
TN.
LOL! I can only guess what the troll said, based on your question, but according to Ford...

View attachment 1713074

- 480 HORSEPOWER = EPIC FAIL
- 634 LB.-FT. TORQUE = WIN (by 3 LB.-FT.)
- 0–60 IN 3.5 SECONDS = TIE
- No 1/4-mile time listed, but 0–60 indicates a possible TIE and more likely FAIL
- No top speed listed, but other sources claim "at least 130 MPH," pointing to another EPIC FAIL
- Tipping the scales at over 1000 lbs heavier, it's certain handling will be another EPIC FAIL

In addition to better performance in almost every measurable way, there's also the fact that the Mach E is an abomination for which Ford should not have defiled the Mustang name.
Just what I thought. Can't wait to get one of them bad boys! lol
 

darksykal

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2019
Messages
108
Location
NY
LOL! I can only guess what the troll said, based on your question, but according to Ford...

View attachment 1713074

- 480 HORSEPOWER = EPIC FAIL
- 634 LB.-FT. TORQUE = WIN (by 3 LB.-FT.)
- 0–60 IN 3.5 SECONDS = TIE
- No 1/4-mile time listed, but 0–60 indicates a possible TIE and more likely FAIL
- No top speed listed, but other sources claim "at least 130 MPH," pointing to another EPIC FAIL
- Tipping the scales at over 1000 lbs heavier, it's certain handling will be another EPIC FAIL

In addition to better performance in almost every measurable way, there's also the fact that the Mach E is an abomination for which Ford should not have defiled the Mustang name.
smells like an 11.5@118mph

Zzzz
 

Cobra Therapy

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
388
Location
chicago illinois
LOL! I can only guess what the troll said, based on your question, but according to Ford...

View attachment 1713074

- 480 HORSEPOWER = EPIC FAIL
- 634 LB.-FT. TORQUE = WIN (by 3 LB.-FT.)
- 0–60 IN 3.5 SECONDS = TIE
- No 1/4-mile time listed, but 0–60 indicates a possible TIE and more likely FAIL
- No top speed listed, but other sources claim "at least 130 MPH," pointing to another EPIC FAIL
- Tipping the scales at over 1000 lbs heavier, it's certain handling will be another EPIC FAIL

In addition to our cars having better performance in almost every measurable way, there's also the fact that the Mach E is an abomination for which Ford should not have defiled the Mustang name.
The mach e is an EPIC FAIL,and ford performance is not that far behind!!
 

1Kona_Venom

US Army (Ret)
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
4,936
Location
Savannah, Ga
And I quite enjoy my base model, thank you very much. 13,000 miles is considered high mileage?

That comment was made with 100% sarcasm. But no bs, depending on the owner and who it is, they would consider 13,000 high. I don't think you have anything to worry about
 

1 Alibi 2

Veteran,...retired Navy !
Established Member
SVTP OG 4 Life
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,798
Location
Hackettstown, N.J.
i am having a hard time classifying the comparison of a Mach E GT to a Trinity car as ignorant, or having been made by a cognitively impaired person.....Either way, the resulting conclusion is the same. You must be "special" in some regard.
.
......................Some posts just speak for themselves..
 

nrmustang

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
674
Location
California
So, been thinking about whether or not I wanted to reply to this thread. Bought my 2014 with 30k in January. With every option. Glass roof, perf pack, track pack, Nav, subs, recaros - for $45k OTD. Second owner, no paint work. Blows my mind how much it could sell for right now.

Have had 12 Mustangs, so no real sentimental attachment. Thinking of selling this and a couple other cars and getting a ‘21…
 

HPLouis

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2002
Messages
1,708
Location
New York City
So, been thinking about whether or not I wanted to reply to this thread. Bought my 2014 with 30k in January. With every option. Glass roof, perf pack, track pack, Nav, subs, recaros - for $45k OTD. Second owner, no paint work. Blows my mind how much it could sell for right now.

Have had 12 Mustangs, so no real sentimental attachment. Thinking of selling this and a couple other cars and getting a ‘21…

I struggle with this almost everyday. I've got someone offering me $60K for the GT500 and $50K for the Mystichrome. I love the cars but the only thing I'm thinking is that I can take the $110K from selling the cars and paying down my mortgage and retiring in 5 years versus 10 years.

What happens is that I drive the cars and fall in love all over again and that makes it so hard to sell either of them. Both cars are in great shape, no problems, all the stock parts and paperwork, low miles (the GT500 has 8000 and the Mystichrome has 9000) so that makes it even harder to sell them.
 

1Kona_Venom

US Army (Ret)
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
4,936
Location
Savannah, Ga
I struggle with this almost everyday. I've got someone offering me $60K for the GT500 and $50K for the Mystichrome.

Than if you decide you need to replace, now, your the buyer having to offer money like that. Prices of cars and the economy isn't coming down anytime soon.

Houses the same way. 2 houses for sale in my neighborhood, near identical floor plan and sq footage. Priced AND UNDER CONTRACT $140,000 more than what we paid for our house 6 years ago. (ours is cleaner and better btw). I see $$$ signs to sell. No way I'm entering any games as a house buyer.

Same concept
 

nrmustang

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
674
Location
California
@HPLouis I totally understand. I own my own business, and business is good. Two things my wife and I enjoy are traveling and our Mustangs. But for us personally, traveling is 10x better than the car. Way more therapeutic. If you told me to pick one, it wouldn’t be the car.

I dream of the day we can slow down with the business and retire. And the reality is, simplifying would help make that a reality much sooner. As a matter of fact, I was reading an article today that said “The less you have, the more intentional you are. It’s an exercise in minimizing possessions and increasing life experiences."

So to each their own. But there are days, weeks, months that I don’t even have the time to enjoy my ‘67 or my ‘14. A house is totally different. Same concept, yes. But not on the same level. You need your home.
 

gimmie11s

I Race Pontiacs
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
18,488
Location
la la land
smells like an 11.5@118mph

Zzzz

I'd be willing to bet any 25 year old soy latte drinking punk in a new Mach E GT will be able to thoroughly work over any 13/14 owner in this thread in a proper 1/4 mile drag race.

The electric mobile has no gears to shift, no launch control to fumble up, and power driving all 4 tires all but guaranteeing a proper launch from a stop.

You Boomers dont stand a chance. Sorry.

"Man pedal, MAN PEDAL!!-- har har" "200 MPH... har har"
 

svt662

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2012
Messages
1,102
Location
USA
82D14086-C92F-4E48-826B-C091ADFF6892.png
I'd be willing to bet any 25 year old soy latte drinking punk in a new Mach E GT will be able to thoroughly work over any 13/14 owner in this thread in a proper 1/4 mile drag race.

The electric mobile has no gears to shift, no launch control to fumble up, and power driving all 4 tires all but guaranteeing a proper launch from a stop.

You Boomers dont stand a chance. Sorry.

"Man pedal, MAN PEDAL!!-- har har" "200 MPH... har har"
Check this video out, Shelby GT500 vs TESLA
 

COOL COBRA

Hell Yes!
Established Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2012
Messages
4,671
Location
Southern Mo.
I'd be willing to bet any 25 year old soy latte drinking punk in a new Mach E GT will be able to thoroughly work over any 13/14 owner in this thread in a proper 1/4 mile drag race.

The electric mobile has no gears to shift, no launch control to fumble up, and power driving all 4 tires all but guaranteeing a proper launch from a stop.

You Boomers dont stand a chance. Sorry.

"Man pedal, MAN PEDAL!!-- har har" "200 MPH... har har"
I’ve been holding back until now, but.. so I get this west coast vibe straight.
You’re saying it’s takes an asston of gayness & electric bullshit to outrun a 13/14 GT500?
Who the **** wants to play with those ****s anyway?
 

efurlong

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2003
Messages
269
Location
Florida
Availability of 13/14 GT500's remains low. Desirability remains high... demand is growing. Values are high and getting higher. Pretty certain the 13/14 will be "Barrett Jackson" quality cars in the years to come. I suspect the MachE will drive the value of all GT500's up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top