VW of America Changes Name to Voltswagen of America
- Thread starter VRYALT3R3D
- Start date
They should have called it a Mustang
No, but your Panzers ran out of diesel after we bombed the shit outta Ploiesti....
hate to be that guy but panzers used petrol/gasoline ....during ww2 gasoline engines were the most reliable at the time and that is what mattered most.
Leave it to the Nazi to set the record straight.
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Russians ran on diesel.
And vodka.
I think ur underestimating how big VW is and how many assets the company has. They have $500 BILLION in assets.
Nothing will flop when u have that kind of capitol to invest in ur company and the fact is I see more VW's on the road than I do ANY other car!
For every Tesla I see on the road I see 20 other VW's so without a doubt VW will be a threat to any car manufacture as they have been for the last 50 years now.
Nothing will flop when u have that kind of capitol to invest in ur company and the fact is I see more VW's on the road than I do ANY other car!
For every Tesla I see on the road I see 20 other VW's so without a doubt VW will be a threat to any car manufacture as they have been for the last 50 years now.
Mustang SS
They're absolutely a behemoth. But I think you're underestimating EV market buyers
They are looking for a phone that's a car. Tesla does that, very well.
VW will build a car, that's electric, with some tech features.
Not the same thing in the slightest. What will happen is VW will pickup the folks that are less inclined to purchase a Tesla, and more inclined to just want a regular replacement car that happens to be all electric. The key will be how VW handles chargers, the cost of the chargers for home, and general roll out
Typically, you're a moron. But this is a very insightful observation.
we are talking about zee germans...not Russian tractors
You expanded that to all of WW2 which would include the allies. German tank engines where not particularly reliable when compared to the allies (Americans and Russians) and the Russian diesels would have been the most reliable on the battlefield.
Russians also used a compressed air starting systems to insure easy cold starts.
I was really referring to the Germans. They fielded some of the best armor, but far too complex to mass produce, maintain in theatre... they would have been better served mass producing panthers and up gunned panzer IV’s, instead of the monstrous Tiger, King Tiger... Russia got it right with mass producing the T34, good enough tank, easy to build and operate by the peasants they put in them. Fuel was also a big problem for Germany...
Last edited:
Word on the street has it that had the French actually counter attacked the blitzkrieg en masse, Germany didnt have enough fuel to sustain a full-on slugfest. The meth'ed up Panzer and Waffen SS tanker crew's insane initial push disoriented French comms enough that it proved to be the decisive factor in forcing a general retreat.
Enought time for Germany to seize resources and reinforce their advance units. In a nut shell of course
The French actually had marginally better tanks at the time of the Blitzkrieg too, but antiquated tactics kept them from effectively countering the Blitzkrieg.
LOL they put amphetamines in chocolate bars!
Ferdinand Porsche and the people's car he built for Adolf.
Users who are viewing this thread
