Let’s play devils advocate, what about the gun companies and ammo companies? I think it’s very possible they could try and sue the government for essentially putting them out of business. It would lay the groundwork for just enacting stricter laws rather than completely eliminate an entire industry.
Yep. Tell the government to go **** themselves and when bIdEn’S troops are given weapons made by shitty Chinese morons that fail on first shot they’ll be forced to show their handsI always said they all needed to ban together and refuse to sell anything to the US fed Government. Only then these stupid anti constitutional Dems would be kicked into a corner for good and told do not ever open your mouth again.
I hope you like Combat q-tips in OD.i'm willing to compromise. if the government supplies me with my weapons they can regulate which ones i get from them.
Agents are going to find out how good their vests are.
Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com
They can start in LA, Chicago and New York and tell us how that goes for them.They will use Nat Guard units from completely different area of the country.....
Hardly any are issued level iv I would bet (SWAT yes, patrol no) and even then a single shot, while it might not penetrate, is enough to put a man down and out for a significant amount of time in a gunfight.
It’s not a road I think many would be willing to go down.
They will use Nat Guard units from completely different area of the country.....
cop I know in LA told me .. their local gov wants to get rid of vest.. because they are “ scary and military grade”
I ran into that with the whole SAFE act in NY. Had a friend pass away that had some "restricted" firearms. Didn't take long for the troopers to show up and confiscate them. .
Great post. I don't care how many legal degrees / PHDs someone has. The 2A language is pretty simple and clear. Right to own arms shall not be infringed on. That means any arms as far as I am concerned. People should start pushing the cockroach politicians and lawmakers to get rid of all weapon bans. Put the heat on them and go in offensive mode. We don't need no weapon bans! Lift existing bans. Forget about new bans.The real argument will be that the government cannot pass ex post facto laws constitutionally and make illegal what was formerly legal. They can however eliminate the importation as well as the production of new firearms and ammunition. That will leave a constitutional argument that they have in fact violated the second amendment. They can also try the tax maneuver like they did in 1934.
Everyone should know that any firearm you bought legally through a gun shop you filled out a FFL form and the government has access to that and that only. To whom you sell it and under what conditions is strictly up to you. When I ran background checks on firearms I could only get the original buyer. I really don't think there are enough voters in this country to outlaw firearms by passing any constitutional amendment. In fact most Democrats that I know support and have firearms. It's only the radical left in the freaking news media and a half-minded president that think otherwise.
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using the svtperformance.com mobile app