Wtf is this Netflix

me32

BEASTLY SHELBY GT500 TVS
Moderator
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
18,457
Location
CA,NorCal
@Steve@TF

parents. smdh


17 years old
Since Thora Birch was barely 17 years old at the time she made the film, and thus classified as a minor in the United States, her parents had to approve her brief topless scene in the movie, and they and child labor representatives were on the set for the shooting of it.
Can i ask how you even know about a topless scene?
 

Steve@TF

Authorized Vendor
Authorized Vendor
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
19,702
Location
So Cal
Can i ask how you even know about a topless scene?

batin.jpg
 

CompOrange04GT

Anyone have a strap on my girl can use on me?
Established Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
8,564
Location
Texas
Welcome to 2020

where someone said “ an underage girl showing her tits is okay because it was a good movie “
 

1Kona_Venom

US Army (Ret)
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
4,936
Location
Savannah, Ga
Can i ask how you even know about a topless scene?
When I saw steves post I googled "what age was Thora Birch....blahh blaah"

Cut and pasted the result.

I didnt even know she was topless. Lol


Think I've posted enough on this thread. Gonna go take a nice warm bath with some carmel scented bathbombs and than sit and watch tv with a fresh bag on Chee-tos tonight.
 
Last edited:

Black02GT

*Not 2KBlackGT
Established Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2004
Messages
6,227
Location
NY
Welcome to 2020

where someone said “ an underage girl showing her tits is okay because it was a good movie “

Let's be real, show is ****ed up. American Beauty had a better story so it gets a bit more slack. She was 17 with parental consent. At least my takeaway from that scene and the follow up was that character was sick, it wasn't normalizing behavior.

How many state blue and red can you mary a 14-15 year old?

I get how you can see this essentially a psychological attack and normalizing it which is why its disturbing. I'm far more disgusted by some of the laws on the books. Think R. Kelly and the parents involved and depending where you are that is okay.

Amazing, like some racial things nobody wants to address it cause its a trigger issue both sides throw at each other. ****ing stupid. We can really address this issue head on. I'm sure don't creep on kids polls well nationally.

At the same time no laws broken with this show. So its a 1A thing, no matter how nasty this is. Really a tough one to deal with if you argue all sides. Unless you put laws/rules on the books its fair game. Censorship is a spider egg. Hard to poke without having to burn the whole house down.

All I know is Netflix has some good shows so I'm not punishing myself and canceling, sure as **** not watching that though. Guess its the bitch stance...

****, I just want to watch something entertaining
and drink a beer after work. New series on the Challenger disaster is disturbingly calming all things considered these days.

Stop watching sports its political, stop watching Netflix its political. Watching the bird feeder the other day Robin Red Breast got taken out by a Blue Jay. Is this racist because the colors or sexist because the breasts?!
 
Last edited:

Corbic

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
10,930
Location
Desert Oasis
At the same time no laws broken with this show. So its a 1A thing, no matter how nasty this is. Really a tough one to deal with if you argue all sides. Unless you put laws/rules on the books its fair game. Censorship is a spider egg. Hard to poke without having to burn the whole house down.


Need to brush on your law skills.
 

Gravik

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
4,286
Location
Idaho
Welcome to 2020

where someone said “ an underage girl showing her tits is okay because it was a good movie “
The funny thing is a lot of comments defending the movie on news articles are coming from women. for example

Screenshot_20200912-172816_Facebook.jpg


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

jeffh81

Here’s KingBlack
Established Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
8,870
Location
Home
You already said that, you pervert.

7 posts on a forum and already defending pedophilia. I hope to see LL's old banhammer very soon.

So are you really trying to say this movie is ok because it can make money? Seriously, that is your legit defense of this movie? You do realize people make money off trafficking kids for sex right? Guess that is ok because there is a market for it.

You are a sick individual who clearly has no moral standards. Who cares if worse stuff is out there. Doesn't mean we should be ok with a company encouraging children to act like strippers.

We most definitely can tell people to not watch this. Its borderline child pornography. Children deserve to be protected, not preyed upon by perverts. This movie is a perversion.

It makes no difference what the motive is for making the film if the content is morally wrong. If you can't wrap your head around that, I can only assume you approve of the content, your pathetic attempt at denying so aside.

And to this hd117 knucklehead. This is nothing to do with conservative vs liberal. It is right vs wrong. Get your shit together and stand for something.

Signatures are for pus... oh, wait...

Will you GTFO here. If you’re going to use all your big words to make your pedo acceptance seem ok, at least spell check your shit.



“BLM is doing God’s work”
2KblackGT

svtperformance.com mobile app

That's not the point. We get it, we can choose to watch it or not or subscribe to netflix or not. But regardless of that, it is never acceptable to produce soft core child pornography. And that is what this is.

Ban Please.

View attachment 1662469


He's one of three things.

1.Existing member who created a fake account to troll or promote his "alternative lifestyle".

2. Chinese bot sent to spread propaganda and either support pedos or run PR interference for Netflix.

3. FBI/Vox agent trying to build a case to smear SVTPF as a nest of fringe Trump supporters.


Either way, this "74 year old pedo apologist" is not a community member.

Die in a wildfire, Pedobear.

HD117 - child explotation is a line which should not be crossed, profits be damned.

HD117 - Like everything else people produce what sells. Politics aside, profit is what drives most any endeavor.

Disgusting.


Mr. Wobig better hit the streets before i let lose on his address
 

svtfocus2cobra

Opprimere, Velocitas, Violentia Operandi
Established Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
26,233
Location
Washington
Again, you miss the point. Crap like this is produced for one reason...to make money. Those who choose to watch it do so because that is their prerogative. Is the subject material proper? Not to me, but then I can't tell you what you should or should not watch. Netflix is a business. And as such you may or may not subscribe. That's your choice. But I hate to tell you that this movie is rather tame compared to the crap that young adults have access to on their phones and tablets.

And traffickers are making money by exploiting underage girls too so is that just their prerogative? What kind of laxidasical morals do you live by? Your justification for illegal activity, like child pornography, is the question of whether they are making money off of it as opposed to receiving strictly a pleasure response? What the **** is wrong with you? Did it occur to you at all that your replies on here make you look as though you are sympathetic to the material being portrayed and have something to gain from it? Because you are on the complete opposite end of the spectrum as the rest of us. We are proponents of more child protections and less exploitation and you are advocating that everyone just look away, just let it happen and don't say anything if you don't like it. I'll remember that the next time I see an article about a young girl who has been kidnapped in order to be trafficked to pedophiles. It's just their prerogative, right?
 

jeffh81

Here’s KingBlack
Established Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
8,870
Location
Home
And traffickers are making money by exploiting underage girls too so is that just their prerogative? What kind of laxidasical morals do you live by? Your justification for illegal activity, like child pornography, is the question of whether they are making money off of it as opposed to receiving strictly a pleasure response? What the **** is wrong with you? Did it occur to you at all that your replies on here make you look as though you are sympathetic to the material being portrayed and have something to gain from it? Because you are on the complete opposite end of the spectrum as the rest of us. We are proponents of more child protections and less exploitation and you are advocating that everyone just look away, just let it happen and don't say anything if you don't like it. I'll remember that the next time I see an article about a young girl who has been kidnapped in order to be trafficked to pedophiles. It's just their prerogative, right?


I want to know how his speech pathology patients feel about his pedo ass o_O
 

Kevins89notch

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
6,651
Location
Central Florida
The funny thing is a lot of comments defending the movie on news articles are coming from women. for example

View attachment 1663307

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I was thinking more like some southern bell, going full Karen on FB, demanding everyone cancel netflix, she's tweeting the CEO, she's writing her congressmen... and then marching her daughter off to the little miss Charlotte contest.
 

CompOrange04GT

Anyone have a strap on my girl can use on me?
Established Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
8,564
Location
Texas
Netflix decided to cancel the dark crystal but not cuties

icguess the Emmy it won isn’t as important as pedophiles
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top