RAM TRX debut

blk02edge

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
8,937
Location
BC
Reality- here is what most buyers look at

Does it have big tires? Yes

does it have that Tesla screen? Yes

does it have those cool looking shocks? Yes

does it look big? Yes

does it have those little orange lights at night? Yes

does it sound better than the raptor? Yes

does it have lots of power to brag about? Yes

sweeeeeeeet let’s buy one
I'm aware lol. I just make fun of people like that. Dodge should have just built a street truck
 

Blk04L

. . .
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
11,324
Location
South Florida
I like it, but not sure I like it enough to switch brands, largely due to the uncertainly of how well it will handle offroading/jumping.
Interior looks great, engine is very nice. But I also echo the wonder over if bean counters overruled a bigger shock... I'm sure it'll be fine, but just feel 3.0's should of been the minimum due to weight and more damping/oil. For the Gen 1 Raptor, going from a 2.5 to 3.0 resulted in the 3.0 shocks have 60% more damping area than stock 2.5" shocks. Now of course I'm no shock expert.

Also, starting at 72k for cloth interior ain't cheap. I like that they did say they'll build as many as need be, hopefully, killing the risk of ADMs

Bilsteins? Probably never.

Gen 1 had 2.5" shocks right?

Yup. And you could send them on 2.5s just fine.
(Bumpstops help too).
 

VRYALT3R3D

Show me your Members
Established Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
6,379
Location
Toronto, ON
Reality- here is what most buyers look at

Does it have big tires? Yes

does it have that Tesla screen? Yes

does it have those cool looking shocks? Yes

does it look big? Yes

does it have those little orange lights at night? Yes

does it sound better than the raptor? Yes

does it have lots of power to brag about? Yes

sweeeeeeeet let’s buy one

and can I have finance it for 96 months
 

CompOrange04GT

Anyone have a strap on my girl can use on me?
Established Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2011
Messages
8,669
Location
Texas
I know you don't buy these things for MPG...but it better have a 60 gal tank if you're going to play hard in really remote areas...maybe instead of a bed mounted spare option...they should have a bed mounted aux tank option!
(anyone that has had a roots/screw blower car knows they LOVE their fuel, adding 35" rubber and 2000lbs ain't gonna help)


Tell you what.. working in the middle of nowhere hours from anywhere. I’m glad at times I had a tank on the back of my truck to hot fuel with
 

My94GT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
8,685
Location
woodbine, MD
and can I have finance it for 96 months

min a more realistic note, if I can get 0% financing and good trade value for my current ram I would be very tempted to buy. Outside of that, yes I always laugh when I see people talking about 900-1200 dollar notes on something that will tank in value like a standard ram
 

Corbic

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
11,274
Location
Desert Oasis
Yea.... So? A 2.5" body is what you see on a RZR XP. Body size is the damping strength, the remote resi only separates the oil from the nitrogen charge and keeps it slightly cooler.

Regardless, it's weak AF. My sub 4k Ranger is on 2.5's and they are even too small.
Are you out of touch?

https://camburg.com/product-category/suspension/susp-shocks/

2.5" is pretty much the standard go-to for aftermarket LT kits.

Again, this AND the RAPTOR are not competition PreRunners nor Trophy trucks.

That's like calling a GT500 a Nascar or a Hellcat a Topfuel Dragster.

A SxS destroys the Raptor off road and that comparison is like bitching about how a Hayabusa will squash a 911.
 
Last edited:

ON D BIT

Finish First
Established Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2003
Messages
16,212
Location
Currently in Sonoma County
Are you out of touch?

https://camburg.com/product-category/suspension/susp-shocks/

2.5" is pretty much the standard go-to for aftermarket LT kits.

Again, this AND the RAPTOR are not competition PreRunners nor Trophy trucks.

That's like call a GT500 a Nascar or a Hellcat a Topfuel Dragster.

A SxS destroys the Raptor off road and that comparison is like bitching about how a Hayabusa will squash a 911.
Your link proves his point. 2.5 ranger long travel and the 2.5 1500 long travel. If they recommend it for the lightweight ranger the extra weight of the 1500 would not be optimum.
 

Corbic

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
11,274
Location
Desert Oasis
Your link proves his point. 2.5 ranger long travel and the 2.5 1500 long travel. If they recommend it for the lightweight ranger the extra weight of the 1500 would not be optimum.
They also have 2.0 Ranger and 1500 shocks.

Doesn't prove anything. That is their width. It doesn't take into consideration spring rate, length, bypass, cooling efficiency, and setup geometry.

Your argument is like saying "Hey, a 1.8L Honda runs a 3" exhaust, so clearly a GT500 needs a 6" straight pipe.
 

ssj4sadie

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2001
Messages
9,181
Location
San Antonio, TX
They also have 2.0 Ranger and 1500 shocks.

Doesn't prove anything. That is their width. It doesn't take into consideration spring rate, length, bypass, cooling efficiency, and setup geometry.

Your argument is like saying "Hey, a 1.8L Honda runs a 3" exhaust, so clearly a GT500 needs a 6" straight pipe.
So because an aftermarket company makes budget friendly (read: less capable) shocks, that somehow equates to 2.5” shocks being the standard “LT” setup across the board? LoL ok.
 

GTSpartan

Yield right!!!!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
9,350
Location
The Woods
Why don't we wait and see how it actually performs before we start WW3 over the merits of a 2,3,4,.....10" shock diameter?

The guys that design these things and the suppliers they work with piss out more knowledge and expertise every morning when they wake up than the entire collective knowledge of this site. Federal regs and the bean counters though, are the great equalizers.
 

bigja01cobra

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
364
Location
Jackson, TN
Why don't we wait and see how it actually performs before we start WW3 over the merits of a 2,3,4,.....10" shock diameter?

The guys that design these things and the suppliers they work with piss out more knowledge and expertise every morning when they wake up than the entire collective knowledge of this site. Federal regs and the bean counters though, are the great equalizers.

The haters have to find 1 thing to hate and it was the shock diameter. Let's see how they perform in tests. I think the Raptor should have the offroad as they have 3 generations of real world R&D available. Dodge just has 702 hp and just copied the Raptor looking at the specs lol
 

ZINCYELLOW01

Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
209
Location
Pittsburgh
You guys must all be suspension engineers.

The current generation Raptor is dead from a competitive standpoint. Ford will have the opportunity to compete with the next one.
 

blk02edge

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
8,937
Location
BC
Are you out of touch?

https://camburg.com/product-category/suspension/susp-shocks/

2.5" is pretty much the standard go-to for aftermarket LT kits.

Again, this AND the RAPTOR are not competition PreRunners nor Trophy trucks.

That's like calling a GT500 a Nascar or a Hellcat a Topfuel Dragster.

A SxS destroys the Raptor off road and that comparison is like bitching about how a Hayabusa will squash a 911.
No... I'm just likely the only person in here who has built, owns and drives an actual prerunner with over a decade of obsessive research into my build. But please do act like you have a clue lol

The 2.5 is the standard go to for trucks that also run a separate bypass and hydros. A single 2.5 coilover is **** all in a huge over powered truck. Like I said, my Ranger is running Radflo 2.5 Remote resis (functionally bigger than a 2.5 IBP) and 3" stroke Hydros and even it will blow through the stroke on larger hits. When you start throwing valving and spring rates at that as a solution you will literally boil your shock fluid.

End of the day, the people who built this truck had their hands tied, they needed to make a truck that is streetable, and like the Raptor it's limits are small
 
Last edited:

IA Shelby

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
3,586
Location
Iowa
Out of curiosity, where do you think it falls short?
My opinion was just that..an opinion and not fact. To answer your question, I think these are the things that I was underwhelmed by.
1) the exterior looks - Raptor looks much better
2) vehicle weight - these are designed for high speed Baja running. This thing looks plump.
3) Price
4) suspension - speculation not fact. A true off-road comparison by an independent 3rd party will obviously be a much better source. Raptor has been battled tested and then some.
5) handling - again speculation not fact.

I could completely wrong. That was just my reaction meaning it is not credible to anyone except me. I am not a hater by any means. But it didn’t raise my blood pressure and say to me I have to have one. The new Bronco did the exact opposite. I reserved one immediately. Again just personal preference.

for those of you that want it, that is fantastic. I love the feeling of really wanting a vehicle. The only other Vehicle I have that level of desire for aside from the new Bronco, is a 65 Shelby cobra replica. We are all fortunate to have more choices that we can ever likely afford except Treynor.
 

Corbic

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
11,274
Location
Desert Oasis
My opinion was just that..an opinion and not fact. To answer your question, I think these are the things that I was underwhelmed by.
1) the exterior looks - Raptor looks much better
2) vehicle weight - these are designed for high speed Baja running. This thing looks plump.
3) Price.

I get that. While I think it's a great looking truck, it doesn't look as radically different from a Ram as a Raptor does from a stock F150.

I got the TRX adds 600# to a Ram, it's adding a blower, 8HP90 and 35's. I didn't see total weight, Raptor is 6,600lbs.

Price is right where I expected it to be. I think most where worried they'd pull a Trackhawk and charge $90-100k for it.

A Rebel 5.7, Crew Cab, 4x4 has a base MSRP of $49,430.
 

GotHemi?

Hell Kitty Nut Swinger
Established Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Messages
3,244
Location
New Orleans
Man 2.5" shocks are way too small. These heavy bastards need 3.5's.

Welp.. only place it'll kill a Raptor is on the way to Starbucks.

Which is where 90% of them will be. Probably have a better chance of getting struck by lightning than these two running across each other in the desert.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top