Manufacturer 84 at 0%

jaxbusa

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2015
Messages
688
Location
Northeast Florida
know I'm late to this conversation but who in their right mind would do a 84 month payment, that's a 1/3 mortgage payment... that's ****ing dumb

It's not tax absurd and basically a loss the second you drive it off the lot plus crappy warranty and cost of ownership thus there are no true issues future wise

Once out of my lease I'm buying my next vehicle cash and walking away from dealers altogether.

A guy at work bought a diesel GMC truck and got an 84 month payment. The dealer wasn’t doing a zero interest on diesel either. I couldn’t imagine paying interest on a vehicle for 84 months.


Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 

gimmie11s

I Race Pontiacs
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
18,587
Location
la la land
Show your numbers then....gas v diesel light.

On another note: View attachment 1632008

Ok lets go to school.
3.0 Powerstroke is a $4000 option. 3.5 Ecoboost is $600
DEF is about a $.01 a mile
I'm going to go with the EPA's rated mpg, not some hyper milers internet claims
Powerstroke-22 combined mpg's
3.5tt - 18 combined mpg's
Over the course of say 100,000 miles you'll use 4545 gallons of diesel and 5555 gallons of gas with the ecoboost.
Diesel runs about $.75 to $1 more a gallon. Currently it is a $1 more
PSD will cost $13,635 in fuel +$1000 in DEF
Ecoboost will cost $11,110
$3600 initial cost plus $2500 more in fuel plus $1000 DEF equals an additional $7100 of operating cost over the course of 100,000 miles.
It's slower, tows less, and I'm sure there is other things the PSD needs that cost more then a 3.5EB.
10-15 years ago when regular and diesel were about the same price and you didn't need to add Obama fluid or the engine wasn't choked by emissions the PSD or EcoDiesel would've made sense. Today it just doesn't, imo.

18mpg combined on the ecoboost is laughable first of all. So is 22 for the powerstroke. Those numbers are more like 16 and 28. Diesel is no $1 more per gallon, it's about .50 more per gallon. $1000 in DEF? LMAO.. ok. Plus no one was even talking about that junk, overpriced powerstroke...

The comparison we are talking about was/is Ram Hemi vs. 3.0 Ecodiesel and/or GM 6.2 vs. their new 3.0 duramax.

For either above you can expect ~16 mpg combined out of the 6.2 or 5.7. Give or take 2 mpg. For the diesels, you can expect 28 combined give or take 2 mpg.

At 1500 miles per month (i would say is average for most) the gas engines are using 93.75 gallons of fuel. At $2/gallon thats $187.5.

At 1500 miles per month the diesel engines are using 53.6 gallons costing $134.

Annual savings on fuel is about $650 per year with the diesel which means it would take you 3 years to recover the cost of the upgrade.

Obviously if you drive twice that amount (many people do), it would only take a year and a half.

But all of that aside, some people just want a diesel because they are torquey'er early in the rpm range and are more enjoyable while towing.

Not to mention the fact that it is VERY easy to add power to an already turbocharged engine.

Any of the light duty diesel motors will make 500+ wheel torque with very simple changes.
 
Last edited:

me32

BEASTLY SHELBY GT500 TVS
Moderator
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
18,479
Location
CA,NorCal
I don’t think ford realizes how bad this down turn is and how long it will last. Unless they just want to keep product in lots.
If that’s the case both ford and dealers will just be paying interest on their debts.

Back in 2008/2009 lots of ford dealers closed and went out of business, unfortunately i see that happening all over again because of the lack of wanting to sell.

So far i have been contacted today alone by more dodge dealership in 1 day than in the last month by ford dealerships. Thats not a good sign for ford dealership in my area.
 

me32

BEASTLY SHELBY GT500 TVS
Moderator
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
18,479
Location
CA,NorCal
18mpg combined on the ecoboost is laughable first of all. So is 22 for the powerstroke. Those numbers are more like 16 and 28. Diesel is no $1 more per gallon, it's about .50 more per gallon. $1000 in DEF? LMAO.. ok. Plus no one was even talking about that junk, overpriced powerstroke...

The comparison we are talking about was/is Ram Hemi vs. 3.0 Ecodiesel and/or GM 6.2 vs. their new 3.0 duramax.

For either above you can expect ~16 mpg combined out of the 6.2 or 5.7. Give or take 2 mpg. For the diesels, you can expect 28 combined give or take 2 mpg.

At 1500 miles per month (i would say is average for most) the gas engines are using 93.75 gallons of fuel. At $2/gallon thats $187.5.

At 1500 miles per month the diesel engines are using 53.6 gallons costing $134.

Annual savings on fuel is about $650 per year with the diesel which means it would take you 3 years to recover the cost of the upgrade.

Obviously if you drive twice that amount (many people do), it would only take a year and a half.

But all of that aside, some people just want a diesel because they are torquey'er early in the rpm range and are more enjoyable while towing.

Not to mention the fact that it is VERY easy to add power to an already turbocharged engine.

Any of the light duty diesel motors will make 500+ wheel torque with very simple changes.

The problem with your post was the true cost of def. You also did not post actual cost of diesel fuel and real cost of 87 octane.

Currently in nor cal 87 is $2.49 to about $2.89 a gallon.

Diesel cost about $3.59-$3.99 a gallon.

Def cost about $7 to $8 a gallon
 

VRYALT3R3D

Show me your Members
Established Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
6,379
Location
Toronto, ON
Does the dealer pay the manufacturer for the vehicle when it’s delivered to the dealer or when it’s sold to the Customer?
I’ve heard both.
That is why I put "sold" in quotation marks. Most dealerships tend to floorplan their inventory either through a bank or the manufacturer. Some manufacturers count a car as "sold" when it is delivered to the dealership.
 

M91196

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
719
Location
New England
Does the dealer pay the manufacturer for the vehicle when it’s delivered to the dealer or when it’s sold to the Customer?

I’ve heard both.

Thinking they floor plan them, paying interest only for 30-90 days then principal and interest after that time.

They need churn

I believe it’s officially sold when it’s titled to a civilian. Demo and program cars probably different rules
 

me32

BEASTLY SHELBY GT500 TVS
Moderator
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
18,479
Location
CA,NorCal
Does the dealer pay the manufacturer for the vehicle when it’s delivered to the dealer or when it’s sold to the Customer?

I’ve heard both.

Technically its not sold till a customer buys it. Thats what those quarterly sales numbers show. Most dealerships are making some sort of payments on the inventory.
 
Last edited:

me32

BEASTLY SHELBY GT500 TVS
Moderator
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
18,479
Location
CA,NorCal
That is why I put "sold" in quotation marks. Most dealerships tend to floorplan their inventory either through a bank or the manufacturer. Some manufacturers count a car as "sold" when it is delivered to the dealership.

Thinking they floor plan them, paying interest only for 30-90 days then principal and interest after that time.

They need churn

I believe it’s officially sold when it’s titled to a civilian. Demo and program cars probably different rules

This right here
 

ON D BIT

Finish First
Established Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2003
Messages
16,212
Location
Currently in Sonoma County
This right here
Sold is not the right word. I was looking at when the manufacturer gets the money from the dealer. If the manufacturer does not get paid until the customer pays for it they have excellent incentive to get it to the customer.

As I said earlier it’s better to get 90% than 0%. I’ve heard trucks make as much as $10k for the manufacturer at dealer pricing.
If a dealer pays $50k and msrp is $55k this would make manufacturer cost at $40k.
If the dealer sold this truck for $37k($36k ford, $1k dealer profit) it would then be sold at 90% of manufacturer cost.
Would ford sell it for this? Haha
Maybe I’m just not realistic. Again $36k is better than nothing or sitting around for another year.
 

7998

Don't Care
Established Member
Malt Liquor Mafia
Joined
Mar 12, 2008
Messages
3,767
Location
PA
18mpg combined on the ecoboost is laughable first of all. So is 22 for the powerstroke. Those numbers are more like 16 and 28. Diesel is no $1 more per gallon, it's about .50 more per gallon. $1000 in DEF? LMAO.. ok. Plus no one was even talking about that junk, overpriced powerstroke...

The comparison we are talking about was/is Ram Hemi vs. 3.0 Ecodiesel and/or GM 6.2 vs. their new 3.0 duramax.

For either above you can expect ~16 mpg combined out of the 6.2 or 5.7. Give or take 2 mpg. For the diesels, you can expect 28 combined give or take 2 mpg.

At 1500 miles per month (i would say is average for most) the gas engines are using 93.75 gallons of fuel. At $2/gallon thats $187.5.

At 1500 miles per month the diesel engines are using 53.6 gallons costing $134.

Annual savings on fuel is about $650 per year with the diesel which means it would take you 3 years to recover the cost of the upgrade.

Obviously if you drive twice that amount (many people do), it would only take a year and a half.

But all of that aside, some people just want a diesel because they are torquey'er early in the rpm range and are more enjoyable while towing.

Not to mention the fact that it is VERY easy to add power to an already turbocharged engine.

Any of the light duty diesel motors will make 500+ wheel torque with very simple changes.

Look I disagree. First off I used the EPA's numbers. I have 2019 Platinum with the 6.5' bed FX4 with the max tow package. Probably the heaviest F-150 you can get. I averaged 19.1 mpg over the course of 9400 miles. I often average over 20 mpg's on trips.
Second, nowhere in my region (NYC-Philly) is diesel within $.50/gallon. I buy it for my Kubota, my work trucks and equipment use it. Granted you're on the West coast and things may be different. But around here its a dollar more.
Thirdly, I can put a tune on my 3.5tt and I bet I'd post better numbers torque and horsepower wise.

But to each their own. Some people like diesels. I'm just saying it doesn't make financial sense.
 

Corbic

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
11,266
Location
Desert Oasis
If Lincoln doesnt start offering 0-84 with incentives on the 2019s or even 2020, i maybe going to dodge for the 1st time with a scat challenger as a DD.
Dooooo it!!
IMG_20200202_174033.jpeg
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top