Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us Event

I had a few minutes to play around with the force calculators..

With some estimates on weight and speed (didn't shoot too high or too low), the force from the airplane alone (excluding the fuel), is that of 8-9 tomahawk cruise missiles at once.

Yeah I have no idea why they fell.

AustinJ427 said:

I had a few minutes to play around with the force calculators..

With some estimates on weight and speed (didn't shoot too high or too low), the force from the airplane alone (excluding the fuel), is that of 8-9 tomahawk cruise missiles at once.

Yeah I have no idea why they fell.

Click to expand...

Space lasers

Coiled03 said:

WTF? How the hell did this thread turn into a 9/11 conspiracy theory discussion?

Oh well....at least I'm getting some good chuckles from the people who know nothing about material science, or thermodynamics.

Click to expand...

But muh YouTubes and Tin Foils!!!!!


Karen is the Ken Block of AWD minivans.

CV355 said:

I'm holding my own chain on this discussion. I want to join so bad. Can't... Reveal... Power... Level...

Click to expand...

You know one of the guys who planted explosives all over the place?

Damn son.

CV355 said:

I'm holding my own chain on this discussion. I want to join so bad. Can't... Reveal... Power... Level...

Click to expand...

Bet...ya...can’t...impress....us...........


.....

Pussy.


Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

72MachOne99GT said:

You know one of the guys who planted explosives all over the place?

Damn son.

Click to expand...

Better than that, he's got the receipt!

Heat rises.

Smooth said:

A ****in' Boeing 767.

View attachment 1587930

Yer affirming my characterization of you.

Click to expand...

Trump must be a dumbass. You wanted the gov./media to give you a reasonable, mainstream story to justify why the WTC was on fire and collapsed. And they gave one to you that you would accept it as reasonable without having to think or question anything. Zero facts, nothing but their word, and you still don't question it.

Twisted2v said:

Trump must be a dumbass. You wanted the gov./media to give you a reasonable, mainstream story to justify why the WTC was on fire and collapsed. And they gave one to you that you would accept it as reasonable without having to think or question anything. Zero facts, nothing but their word, and you still don't question it.

Click to expand...

What engineering discipline is Trump’s degree in?


Karen is the Ken Block of AWD minivans.

Twisted2v said:

Trump must be a dumbass. You wanted the gov./media to give you a reasonable, mainstream story to justify why the WTC was on fire and collapsed. And they gave one to you that you would accept it as reasonable without having to think or question anything. Zero facts, nothing but their word, and you still don't question it.

Click to expand...

Don't speak for me junior. You know nothing about me.

Twisted2v said:

Trump must be a dumbass. You wanted the gov./media to give you a reasonable, mainstream story to justify why the WTC was on fire and collapsed. And they gave one to you that you would accept it as reasonable without having to think or question anything. Zero facts, nothing but their word, and you still don't question it.

Click to expand...

Hmm....let's see. The events can be explained by either science and data, or preposterous conspiracy theories. I know which one I'm going to believe.

The MSM didn't "give" me anything. They aren't smart enough to understand what happened. But, dozens upon dozens of smart people have studied it, and provided the answers using reasonable, well understood science that also happens to be the simplest explanation.

I am equipped to do the job....but I'm not gonna try hahaha. These retards are gonna get BLLLAAASSTTEEDD

Architects and engineers for 9/11 truth.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth | WTC Twin Towers and Building 7
These guys seem to know something about architectural engineering...

A 3 billion lbs steel building was leveled by a 200,000 lbs aluminum plane and and it’s fuel...? Keep in mind these buildings had 200,000 metric tons of steel. That’s 4,409,000 lbs of steel.

That’s some damn impressive payload for a 200,000lbs aluminum vessel.

Our military should have just lauded old 767’s on auto pilot loaded with jet fuel at jihad bases in the east instead of dropping the MOAB on that mole hill. Much cheaper and Obviously would have done much more than the 20,000lbs moab.

The a36 steel at the top of the towers was much lighter duty than the progressively stronger a100 at the base. The majority of the weight and tensil strength of the buildings was at the bottom and into about a 3rd up.

How would this collapse straight down so far if the impact was high up and clearly on one side? Wouldn’t the weak a36 steel melt at the core and the top half of building slide toward that impact side?

Experts can say all they’d like, I’m just not sold. It’s not a personal attack on them, or their experience in the field. The people here making it personal are saying “you don’t believe what I “know”?! Well f u you moron...

It’s not like that, I’m just me saying it doesn’t pass my smell test. Doesn’t seem natural to me. That’s my gut hunch.

Planes hit 100% for sure, I just happen to think the buildings were also loaded up with some explosive or catalyst compounds to be sure they fell.

Not a gov inside job, but the type of Clinton esc inside job like Brennan and Comie plotting against Trump via Russiagate bullshit.

tt335ci03cobra said:

A 3 billion lbs steel building was leveled by a 200,000 lbs aluminum plane and and it’s fuel...? Keep in mind these buildings had 200,000 metric tons of steel. That’s 4,409,000 lbs of steel.

That’s some damn impressive payload for a 200,000lbs aluminum vessel.

Our military should have just lauded old 767’s on auto pilot loaded with jet fuel at jihad bases in the east instead of dropping the MOAB on that mole hill. Much cheaper and Obviously would have done much more than the 20,000lbs moab.

The a36 steel at the top of the towers was much lighter duty than the progressively stronger a100 at the base. The majority of the weight and tensil strength of the buildings was at the bottom and into about a 3rd up.

How would this collapse straight down so far if the impact was high up and clearly on one side? Wouldn’t the weak a36 steel melt at the core and the top half of building slide toward that impact side?

Experts can say all they’d like, I’m just not sold. It’s not a personal attack on them, or their experience in the field. The people here making it personal are saying “you don’t believe what I “know”?! Well f u you moron...

It’s not like that, I’m just me saying it doesn’t pass my smell test. Doesn’t seem natural to me. That’s my gut hunch.

Planes hit 100% for sure, I just happen to think the buildings were also loaded up with some explosive or catalyst compounds to be sure they fell.

Not a gov inside job, but the type of inside job like Brennan plotting against trump via Russiagate bullshit.

Click to expand...

Is the leaking molten caused by burning jet fuel?

Coiled03 said:

Hmm....let's see. The events can be explained by either science and data, or preposterous conspiracy theories. I know which one I'm going to believe.

The MSM didn't "give" me anything. They aren't smart enough to understand what happened. But, dozens upon dozens of smart people have studied it, and provided the answers using reasonable, well understood science that also happens to be the simplest explanation.

Click to expand...

Lol. Came on here to say "it's likely that smart people have studied it, and anything fed into my brain was probably said by these smart people after they're logical studies I never looked at."

All I know is that if there is more to it than the official story, the conspirators made out like bandits while we're still arguing about it almost two decades later on the internet.

tt335ci03cobra said:

A 3 billion lbs steel building was leveled by a 200,000 lbs aluminum plane and and it’s fuel...? Keep in mind these buildings had 200,000 metric tons of steel. That’s 4,409,000 lbs of steel.

That’s some damn impressive payload for a 200,000lbs aluminum vessel.

Our military should have just lauded old 767’s on auto pilot loaded with jet fuel at jihad bases in the east instead of dropping the MOAB on that mole hill. Much cheaper and Obviously would have done much more than the 20,000lbs moab.

The a36 steel at the top of the towers was much lighter duty than the progressively stronger a100 at the base. The majority of the weight and tensil strength of the buildings was at the bottom and into about a 3rd up.

How would this collapse straight down so far if the impact was high up and clearly on one side? Wouldn’t the weak a36 steel melt at the core and the top half of building slide toward that impact side?

Experts can say all they’d like, I’m just not sold. It’s not a personal attack on them, or their experience in the field. The people here making it personal are saying “you don’t believe what I “know”?! Well f u you moron...

It’s not like that, I’m just me saying it doesn’t pass my smell test. Doesn’t seem natural to me. That’s my gut hunch.

Planes hit 100% for sure, I just happen to think the buildings were also loaded up with some explosive or catalyst compounds to be sure they fell.

Not a gov inside job, but the type of inside job like Brennan plotting against trump via Russiagate bullshit.

Click to expand...

There was still a lot of building on top of the impact zone... chain reaction. The building took itself down