It’s Ma’am ma’an!

MarcSpaz

Resident Trouble Maker
Established Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
2,760
Location
Location: Location:
I had a debate a while back concerning gender assignment. I let my opponent lay out everything possible. This guy discussed science, culture, genetics, legality and so on. His goal was to outsmart me, not have a debate. So I used this to my advantage.

My response was framed in questions. The answers were great.

Me: If I wanted to identify as a chicken, would I be able to do so? Could I purchase a chicken costume, live in a chicken coup, eat chicken feed, and expect the chicken farmer to accept me as a chicken?

Opponent: You are not using a fair comparison. You are missing the point that needs to be established.

Me: How did I miss the point? I could have used any number of examples. Can I identify as a black woman? I'm clearly a white male, but I may not identify mentally with my gender or race. How about if I identify as a child or teenager; would you allow me to date your 16 year old daughter? Would you allow me to identify as a female teenager and have a slumber party at your house?

Opponent: You are slightly back on topic, but you are twisting things around in such a way that identifying as a pedophile is normal. You can't break a law to justify a gender or identity crisis.

Me: Why not; in my mind I identify as such, so therefore I should be treated in that manner. This is exactly what your entire statement stood for. You are willing to defend a person's stance until it conflicts with your moral standing.

Opponent: We aren't discussing morals.

Me: You just allowed your personal convictions judge my approach. That is morality.

So back to my original, less offensive question; can I be a chicken? Can I claim to lay eggs, and even hatch eggs that I cannot physically lay?

Opponent: This is absurd. You are refusing to debate.

Me: Would I be crazy for trying to identify as a chicken?

Opponent: Identifying as a chicken would be ruled as incompetent and psychologists and psychiatrists would deem you insane.

Me: So you are telling me that if I want to identify as something, or even someone, that I am not, that I would be mentally unstable and unfit to live in society?


End of conversation. There were no more rebuttals, questions, or witty remarks. My opponent just called the people he tried to stand for insane.

I really wanted more. I had so much more simple minded material in hand. A religious argument was expected from me. I didn't even touch religion. There was no need. I would have lost the debate. Instead I used my opponent's own logic.

Conclusion: Transgender people have a mental and moral condition.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Brilliant way of going about it! I saw Ben Shapiro debating a YL about this.

 

jeffh81

Here’s KingBlack
Established Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
8,870
Location
Home
I had a debate a while back concerning gender assignment. I let my opponent lay out everything possible. This guy discussed science, culture, genetics, legality and so on. His goal was to outsmart me, not have a debate. So I used this to my advantage.

My response was framed in questions. The answers were great.

Me: If I wanted to identify as a chicken, would I be able to do so? Could I purchase a chicken costume, live in a chicken coup, eat chicken feed, and expect the chicken farmer to accept me as a chicken?

Opponent: You are not using a fair comparison. You are missing the point that needs to be established.

Me: How did I miss the point? I could have used any number of examples. Can I identify as a black woman? I'm clearly a white male, but I may not identify mentally with my gender or race. How about if I identify as a child or teenager; would you allow me to date your 16 year old daughter? Would you allow me to identify as a female teenager and have a slumber party at your house?

Opponent: You are slightly back on topic, but you are twisting things around in such a way that identifying as a pedophile is normal. You can't break a law to justify a gender or identity crisis.

Me: Why not; in my mind I identify as such, so therefore I should be treated in that manner. This is exactly what your entire statement stood for. You are willing to defend a person's stance until it conflicts with your moral standing.

Opponent: We aren't discussing morals.

Me: You just allowed your personal convictions judge my approach. That is morality.

So back to my original, less offensive question; can I be a chicken? Can I claim to lay eggs, and even hatch eggs that I cannot physically lay?

Opponent: This is absurd. You are refusing to debate.

Me: Would I be crazy for trying to identify as a chicken?

Opponent: Identifying as a chicken would be ruled as incompetent and psychologists and psychiatrists would deem you insane.

Me: So you are telling me that if I want to identify as something, or even someone, that I am not, that I would be mentally unstable and unfit to live in society?


End of conversation. There were no more rebuttals, questions, or witty remarks. My opponent just called the people he tried to stand for insane.

I really wanted more. I had so much more simple minded material in hand. A religious argument was expected from me. I didn't even touch religion. There was no need. I would have lost the debate. Instead I used my opponent's own logic.

Conclusion: Transgender people have a mental and moral condition.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk


Meet the 52 Year-Old Father Who Identifies As a 6 Year-Old Girl
 

03Sssnake

TK-421
Established Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
40,146
Location
not at my post...
50480626_2724993237518351_883203567077294080_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.jpg
 

scott9050

Let's go Brandon!
Established Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
4,527
Location
WV
WARNING
LMFAO....misgendering is bigotry and hate? That fact there is even a term for using the 'wrong' pronoun speaks volumes to the insanity...****ing delusional people.

Clearly a dude....I mean there absolutely no ****ing doubt, get that cleft chin fixed and adams apple shaved bro and it would still be obvious with that neanderthal forehead and square jaw..

View attachment 1544242

Is that Dolph Lundgren in drag?
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top