Gen3 VMP TVS

toddyfiveo

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
177
Location
Illinois
IMG_2051.jpg


Sweet baby Jesus. Don’t recall hearing if t was pump gas or e85


Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 

MG0h3

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
13,821
Location
El Paso, TX
Damn. Too slow on my phone. Have to wait until I’m home unless someone can throw out cliffs on the engine specs (stock?) and what boost. Has to be on E


Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com
 

Deceptive

Muffin is my spirit animal
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Messages
13,540
Location
Nashville, TN
Edited because what I read was wrong. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

Riddick

MERICA
Established Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
2,640
Location
Dayton, OH
Block has been rebuilt, 9.2 compression, stock heads and cams. Car was tuned on e85.

Sent from my XT1097 using Tapatalk
 

elcobrita

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
1,158
Location
TX
My understanding is it is a stock longblock and those numbers are on 93. At least that is what I had heard. I heard there was spark blowout issues, cooling issues, and exhaust restrictions.

Personally, I think these blowers will not make much more until you have a built block, head work, and cams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I seriously doubt those numbers were on 93.

You can tell they weren’t expecting the numbers to be as low as they were. They spent 10 minutes coming up with reasons why it “only” made 760.

Good news is that they only took it up to 6200.. with a bigger blower like this, it seems like there is some hp to be made up to 7k




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Riddick

MERICA
Established Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2012
Messages
2,640
Location
Dayton, OH
Not surprised they picked up 10-20 hp from an intake swap alone. I would expect the gains to be even more with a bigger throttle body. I just watched a "Cleetus McFarland" video and he picked up I believe 40 hp from swapping throttle bodies alone on his gen 3 crown vic project.

Do the Whipple 2.9s suffer from the same heat soak issues? I find it odd we keep hearing how efficient this blower is now heat is a huge concern. No doubt the Cobra intercooler is small but I haven't heard of the 2.9s suffering from heat soak. This would worry me a little considering on the street and the track the car will be even hotter especially when doing pulls 1-4. Fact is the car needs a larger intercooler, anyone see how big the intercoolers are on the coyote 2.9s or even the new 3.0 for the 18s, things are monsters. Sorry I keep comparing these set ups to coyotes but crazy how much blowers have evolved.

All in all I think the car did well, as mentioned if you throw in a set of bigger headers the car will pick up more power. Wonder whats causing the car to break up at the top of the power band, just solving that issue alone I bet the car will pick up 10-20 more up top.
 

c6zhombre

E85 NutSwinger
Established Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
5,430
Location
League City, TX
Not what they were looking for. I think they need more test mules, this one is not even a factory block or compression. It seems like they'd have no problem getting 2 or 3 different terminator owners with factory powerplants to commit to test with their new multi $$$ investment with this blower gen. I'd bet people would even pay them for the blower!
 

BlksvtCobra01

Deplorable and Proud
Established Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
13,558
Location
Ohio
Not surprised they picked up 10-20 hp from an intake swap alone. I would expect the gains to be even more with a bigger throttle body. I just watched a "Cleetus McFarland" video and he picked up I believe 40 hp from swapping throttle bodies alone on his gen 3 crown vic project.

Do the Whipple 2.9s suffer from the same heat soak issues? I find it odd we keep hearing how efficient this blower is now heat is a huge concern. No doubt the Cobra intercooler is small but I haven't heard of the 2.9s suffering from heat soak. This would worry me a little considering on the street and the track the car will be even hotter especially when doing pulls 1-4. Fact is the car needs a larger intercooler, anyone see how big the intercoolers are on the coyote 2.9s or even the new 3.0 for the 18s, things are monsters. Sorry I keep comparing these set ups to coyotes but crazy how much blowers have evolved.

All in all I think the car did well, as mentioned if you throw in a set of bigger headers the car will pick up more power. Wonder whats causing the car to break up at the top of the power band, just solving that issue alone I bet the car will pick up 10-20 more up top.

Gotta say was hoping for 800. So we’re talkin 50hp give or take from a 2.3 to this 2.65?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

BlksvtCobra01

Deplorable and Proud
Established Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
13,558
Location
Ohio
Not what they were looking for. I think they need more test mules, this one is not even a factory block or compression. It seems like they'd have no problem getting 2 or 3 different terminator owners with factory powerplants to commit to test with their new multi $$$ investment with this blower gen. I'd bet people would even pay them for the blower!

Sign me up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Shadow Grey 03

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Messages
7,043
Location
Hilliard, Ohio
I would like to see how it would respond to a change from the 1-5/8 headers to either 1-3/4 or 1-7/8. I foresee Malcolm selling more of the crusher intake setups for those going 2.65 as well.
 

SVT Hess

THE 3ND
Established Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
161
Location
Wytheville, VA
I would like to see how it would respond to a change from the 1-5/8 headers to either 1-3/4 or 1-7/8. I foresee Malcolm selling more of the crusher intake setups for those going 2.65 as well.

Same here, I run 1-7/8 x 3 all the way back and would be surprised if there would be any exhaust restriction, if anything I would think you would drop a psi or two.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top