UPDATE :: Return of the Pushrod | Ford's New 7.3L Engine is Actually an OHV V8

RedVenom48

Let's go Brandon!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
7,973
Location
Arizona
Dont forget, this new engine would be mated to a modern 6+ speed transmission. Combine that with a stout torque converter, it would be easy to keep in the power band.
 

MG0h3

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
13,829
Location
El Paso, TX
From the article. VVVVVVVV



If he barely gets 10MPG empty he either has a lead foot, does most of his driving in town, or has an F-450/550. I've consistently knocked down 13MPG empty in a 2009 F-350 with 4.30 gears.

Ya not sure, just what he told me.

Either way this will be interesting if they really do go back to OHV.
 

SID297

OWNER/ADMIN
Administrator
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
55,740
Location
Myrtle Beach, SC
Are you sure it'll be a 2V head?

All the push rods I've talked to said they're fine with 4V heads.

I don't know the valve configuration. Ford has built a 4V pushrod gas motor before, but it never saw the light of day.

2vaczm8.jpg
 

biminiLX

never stock
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2003
Messages
13,276
Location
Toledo, OH
Very interesting, never expected a modern Ford pushrods OHV!
I was REALLY excited for an updated 4V DOHC stroked Raptor 6.2 :(
SHOULD have been better than a pushrod OHV, but you never know--modern tech could give the LSx Motors all they can handle, especially at that displacement.
Hoping for an aluminum block with good bore spacing and heads with huge flow potential if this is to give hot rodders a killer platform. Probably not Fords design criteria, but exciting to see what we really get with this, the next GT500 and other coming pipeline.
-J
 

Revvv

Infinity Poster
Established Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Messages
10,189
Location
GA
Wow. Really surprised about it being OHV.

You think they could copy the Hemi/LT1 method of being "fuel efficient" by shutting down cylinders to improve MPG?
An option that is normally turned off immediately. In my opinion it is bad for the engine, and does not save enough fuel to justify the risk of engine damage.

Sent from my SM-G930V using the svtperformance.com mobile app
 

cougarmandan

Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
32
Location
Bonanza, Arkansas
I was very skeptical about this when I forst read it this morning but the more I think about it, the more it could make sense. Trucks engines are not typically state of the art. They have been sohc when the performance cars were Dohc. Trucks were bank injection when the cars were seqential multi port. Trucks tend to hold on to the tried and true. Truck typically have more relaxed emisions standards. I want to get a Raptor and will probably buy one in the next 2 years and one spokesman already said we will see this motor in upper trim levels like Raptor. I wonder if we will see multiple variations like a 4v all aluminum Raptor engine and 2v iron block in the vans and work trucks. Makes me think of the beloved Cleveland motors. One thing to think about on these big motors is alot of reciprocating mass which doesn't rev up as fast kind of like the 460 (7.5L) truck motor so performance might not be a likely path. It all depends on how its designed I suppose but I am really curious to see what come out. We really do need some sort of Hellcat/Demon alternative.
 

Tighteyes

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
267
Location
NC,Sc
could ford do us like the 3v 2007 before they used the 5.4l. could be raptor this time. and this motor be far into the future!
 

01FormulaTA

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
353
Location
Houston
Very Interesting....that would be amazing if this somehow found its way into a mustang....so Ford is coming out with a new OHV V8 and GM is about to reveal a new DOHC V8 for the C8, never thought I would see the day....
 

hitmix300

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
725
Location
detroit
The Godzilla motor will be a super duty engine; that's the only intentions for this product's development.

I can't wait to see how it handles boost. I wonder if the rotating assembly will be strong..
 

Blk04L

. . .
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2006
Messages
11,324
Location
South Florida
An option that is normally turned off immediately. In my opinion it is bad for the engine, and does not save enough fuel to justify the risk of engine damage.

Sent from my SM-G930V using the svtperformance.com mobile app

I'm not a big fan of that feature. Just curious if it would be an option if the engine made it was down to the F-150/other models that fall under epa mileage rules.
 

SID297

OWNER/ADMIN
Administrator
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
55,740
Location
Myrtle Beach, SC
The Godzilla motor will be a super duty engine; that's the only intentions for this product's development.

I can't wait to see how it handles boost. I wonder if the rotating assembly will be strong..

That's a good question. Since price is a concern I have a feeling it will get 6.2 treatment.
 

merkyworks

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2016
Messages
980
Location
Houston
This makes since for a couple reasons.
1. No question a OHV motor takes up less space in the engine bay. Ever compare a 4.6/5.0/5.4 DOHC next to an LS/LT, it's laughable the difference in footprint.
2. OHV in general is less parts and will cost less.
3. If Ford was to use some sort of cylinder cut off mode, this can be more easily controlled with a pushrod/OHV system than an OHC system.

Edit: Also, if this is for real a performance based aluminum block version would be sick!
 

CV355

_
Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
3,272
Location
_
If they stick this in the new Bronco, I'm sold.
I am actually excited about this
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top