FCA to sell to Chinese company?

MarcSpaz

Resident Trouble Maker
Established Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
2,760
Location
Location: Location:
I don't see how the US government would approve the purchase of Chrysler by a state owned Chinese company. Especially under the Trump administration.


I was thinking the same thing... China is doing massive amounts of business due to mutual capitalist interest, but they are considered a top national security threat. It would be foolish to let them gain more financial leverage in our economy. Most of our foreign debt is to China... why risk our economy more than we already have.
 

mariusvt

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
731
Location
PA
They really only care about the Jeep brand. Jeep and SUVs in general are hugely popular in China, even more so than here.
 

VRYALT3R3D

Show me your Members
Established Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
6,379
Location
Toronto, ON
I was thinking the same thing... China is doing massive amounts of business due to mutual capitalist interest, but they are considered a top national security threat. It would be foolish to let them gain more financial leverage in our economy. Most of our foreign debt is to China... why risk our economy more than we already have.
The Chinese already own a lot of key automotive suppliers. Visteon sold it's entire interior trim operations to a Chinese company. Johnson Controls sold their interior operations to a Chinese company too. There is another supplier that sold their entire operations to the Chinese. The name of the company is just escaping me at the moment.

BTW, Japan holds almost as much U.S. debt as China does. Also technically the government debt never has to be paid back.
 
Last edited:

Sirhc7897

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Messages
1,063
Location
Macclenny, FL
The government will never allow it to happen. Everybody knows the reason the F-22 program was cancelled was because they plan to replace it with a winged and flight ready version of the Demon (hence why they just trademarked the "Angel" moniker).


Sent from my iPhone using svtperformance.com
 

MarcSpaz

Resident Trouble Maker
Established Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
2,760
Location
Location: Location:
I was gonna say, per the US Constitution, our debt is the very first thing we are legally obligated to pay... But that's a discussion for another day.
 

GTSpartan

Yield right!!!!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
9,350
Location
The Woods
Strip away everything but Jeep and Ram and you have very profitable brands. Don't waste your time losing money/eking out a tiny profit on a half your lineup just to be a full-line manufacturer.

You sacrifice scale as a stand-alone operation, but bolted onto a larger outfit could be a potentially appealing business for the right buyer.
 

FortLewisCobra

Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
345
Location
My house
Could you elaborate on this?
The Chinese don't hold near as much of our debt as most people think.
Who owns the debt chart 0816.jpg
 

MarcSpaz

Resident Trouble Maker
Established Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
2,760
Location
Location: Location:
Agreed. Jeep brand is worth $120 billion. They sold 1.6 millio, vehicles in 2016, up 22% from the year before, and Jeep is on track to sell over 2 million units this year.

Jeep and Ram are carrying FCA, from my limited point of view.
 

VRYALT3R3D

Show me your Members
Established Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
6,379
Location
Toronto, ON
Could you elaborate on this?

Sure.

The US government technically doesn't have an obligation to pay off its debt. The government technically "lives forever," so it doesn't have to repay the debt in full or even at all. The US government repays maturing bonds by issuing and selling new bonds. Furthermore, if no one in the future buys that debt, the central bank will. If foreign countries don't buy the debt either, the dollar depreciates. To that end, the government still doesn't have an obligation to repay its debt. That being said, discretionary fiscal policy i.e. inflationary bias increases due to high debt. Although there may be higher taxes to be remitted, the principle still doesn't have to be repaid and only the current interest does. When there is an increase in inflation, the debtors gain. So the federal reserve has some aversion to inflation and inflationary bias depends on that. The costs of government debt depends on the GDP-Debt ratio. If the debt is growing at the same rate as GDP, the tax rate shouldn't be raised(although it tends to be.)
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top