Like I said, randomly having a pocket knife in your pocket bears no relevance in the outcome. Outcome is determined based on whether or not the act was self defense…
In this case, irrelevant of having had a pocket knife on his person, it was found that he acted not in defense, but instead...
Yes, guy got convicted because he lied, ran from the scene, thus killing his credibility.
That and the fact that he was the one to advance on the last person stabbed.
Like I said before, IMO, he was morally justified. But legally ****ed.
FYI. Having had a knife in pocket has nothing to do...
Youre thinking about it like a victim, man.
You deserve better than that.
Yes, plenty of LE are GARBAGE. The person is garbage. But LE as a whole is not. LE is a must in a civilized society.
Dont let the fact that once upon a time, some asshole in a LE uniform hurt your feelings, bias you...
No. LEOs are not ”civilians” while operating in an official capacity.
Yes, LEOs arent held to the same standard as a non-LEO. Why should they? Its a totally different scope. Standards are adjusted to work for that particular field, it is not about the individual.
You must have missed the part where the loud mouth trout went on the attack and lunged at him. self defense. Look at the 0:34-0:35 sec mark.
Then again, a progressive-liberal Jury would get that all types of backwards.
If you are in fear / danger of severe bodily harm or death, you may use any means to halt the threat. Knives, guns, a prosthetic leg, it doesn't matter. It just has to be a threat that is likely to cause severe bodily injury / death.
Getting jumped by a mob, can and has caused severe injury to...
Yea. And then you’d be scrutinized and dissected for defending yourself by arm chair quarterbacks. You would end up in prison away from your family for being too rough and insensitive on the criminal. LOL
****ing clown world!