If that does work, then you have a controller issue or you need to step up to a co2 bottle with your controller for the ultimate control of boost. I went almost a year on 1 2.5lb bottle. So I wouldn't stress about refills. Report back your findings
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
That last one deleted, I would definitely eliminate the controller for testing purposes only. And run a line from the turbo to the bottom of the wastegate. And leave the top of the wastegate open to atmosphere. Then you can see if your wastegates and piping is efficient for what your wanting. If...
What kind of boost controller? I always thought regerence line went from turbo to boost controller and boost controller to waste gate. And then vent would be on the boost solenoid. I would doblue check the boost controller manufacturers recommendation for running a reference line. Im not saying...
Have you tried it with your wg dump pipes removed? Wonder if there is some sort of restriction with them merged together and the pipe size remaining the same.
Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Agree, I have had both heads with 20+lbs of boost. And the c heads outperformed the B heads by a mile. Unless you are spinning the hell out of the motor like mihovetz and want a powerband of 7,000- 10,000 go with B heads. Otherwise stick with c heads
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
I wouldn't blast them either. But with e85 as your fuel choice I see no reason to run low comp and up the boost to make the number. I would much rather up the comp and use a lower boost setting. You will have much better off boost throttle response. And from what I have seen throughout the years...
Mpr builds some badass stuff too. My last build way back in 2005 had 8.7 compression and was lazy. Im currently at 10.8 with the new motor. And with a Borg Warner 8596 it made 1232whp at 25 psi thru a th400. I highly suggest the higher compression with e85. And as 98 saleen cobra said, don't...