Hottest woman of svtp

Hottest woman of svtp

  • Juliet2KG

    Votes: 10 1.6%
  • xOLIZZBETHoX

    Votes: 112 18.3%
  • fiveohhstang

    Votes: 65 10.6%
  • Hybred

    Votes: 206 33.7%
  • ponygrrl

    Votes: 45 7.4%
  • COBRASUSIE

    Votes: 63 10.3%
  • lokslikeasolstic

    Votes: 85 13.9%
  • Snnnake

    Votes: 3 0.5%
  • JulieGT 07CS

    Votes: 6 1.0%
  • Tucan Sam Shana

    Votes: 17 2.8%

  • Total voters
    612
  • Poll closed .

Julie GT07CS

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
2,744
Location
Virginia
julie...that is not a recent pic dear.

Well DUHHHH Kris! :lol:

Don't you like seeing my naturally curly brunette hair? ;-) Naw, that pic is enough for the wolves. Plus Dustin will just make fun of me again!
 
Last edited:

Outlaw99

Join us.
Moderator
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
18,161
Location
North Carolina
Well DUHHHH Kris! :lol:

Don't you like seeing my naturally curly brunette hair? ;-) Naw, that pic is enough for the wolves. Plus Dustin will just make fun of me again!

1974 called....they want their picture back...

srsly...you have absolutely nothing at all to be self critical about.
 

Julie GT07CS

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
2,744
Location
Virginia
depends on the decade the picture was taken. HA!


wooden-spoon.png
 

James Snover

The Ill-Advised Physics Amplification Co
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
8,863
Location
Cypress
Just that it was in color is not that reliable an indicator of the relative age of the picture. For instance, Kodachrome was available since 1939, and three- and four-color prints have been available since 1899. So that still leaves a wide range of potential time-span.

Sorry. I'm in class, I'm bored, and strung-out on coffee to stay awake. You might think the study of inherent quantum noise in a selenium-based flat panel digital detector is interesting. Nope.

Jim Snover

It was taken in the very late 80's FYI, Kris. :bored: 1974?? :rollseyes Gawd. At least it was in color...:lol1:
 

SaleenFiend

04 MC Cobra
Established Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
2,213
Location
Louisiana
Just that it was in color is not that reliable an indicator of the relative age of the picture. For instance, Kodachrome was available since 1939, and three- and four-color prints have been available since 1899. So that still leaves a wide range of potential time-span.
Jim Snover
Where the **** do you find this info or do you just 'know' it?
 

James Snover

The Ill-Advised Physics Amplification Co
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2008
Messages
8,863
Location
Cypress
I've studied photography since high school, thousands and thousands of years ago. I still have a darkroom with a dichroic setup and color analyzer, to develop and print in color. I can't get color chemistry anymore, but I still have all the equipment.

BabySarah is way too cute. But she must be only twelve years old. She looks like my niece!

Jim Snover

Where the **** do you find this info or do you just 'know' it?
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top