Saw this car at Milan for a stick shift race not too long ago. He won it. It was rolling out. Talked to him for a few and it makes silly power and runs really well. Made me really think about running one on my car.
Saw this car at Milan for a stick shift race not too long ago. He won it. It was rolling out. Talked to him for a few and it makes silly power and runs really well. Made me really think about running one on my car.
This will be my exact set up once its all said in done and I'm keeping the 2.3 TVS. I'll be running kurgans cams.Those are great numbers!
Can you please list your engine mods, exhaust etc along with boost level?
I’m still trying to decide between the VMP gen3 and a Whipple Crusher 2.9 gen4 (or the rumored gen5) if it is released for the ‘03 Cobra.
My engine will be a 10.5:1 Aluminator build with Ported heads and either stage 2 cams or custom. Full LT AR headers with 3” collectors and 3” catback. Return fuel system on e85.
Thanks
Ken
That’s what I’m hoping for lol.Btw a 10 to 1 motor with this blower will be absolutely nutty
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Just made 800/720 with a vmp gen3 on e85. Im a believer now
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
....That's in part why I won't swap my 2.3L for the new 2.65LThat would be by far the highest TQ number I have seen posted with the 2.65. Most have been in the 660-670 range. Thats been the biggest complaint I've read from 2.3 TVS owners who have swapped to the 2.65.
Can you post that 800/720 graph?
....That's in part why I won't swap my 2.3L for the new 2.65L
....That's in part why I won't swap my 2.3L for the new 2.65L
That would be by far the highest TQ number I have seen posted with the 2.65. Most have been in the 660-670 range. Thats been the biggest complaint I've read from 2.3 TVS owners who have swapped to the 2.65.
Can you post that 800/720 graph?
So is this a KB v 2.65 TVS comparision??Sorry 793/717 stock compression and displacement 95 degrees and humid two weeks ago here in the south east. Wait until I change my cai so I don’t have a reducer and go smaller on the upper pulley.
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
So is this a KB v 2.65 TVS comparision??
So is this a KB v 2.65 TVS comparision??
Very nice!!! What KB?That graph yes is a before and after with nothing changed except the blower. Same pulley same everything. So I’m not sure where the 660ish torque numbers are from but my buddy same car as I have just made 750 torque same blower. They’re proving to be quite impressive and for the price point and the removable inlet I’m very pleased with the gen 3
Sent from my iPhone using the svtperformance.com mobile app
Nice! Totally different TQ and HP curve versus the 2.65s I've seen dyno that are running stock cams. I think you found the magic cam specs to make the curves look more like the traditional terminator "area under the curve" we're use to seeing (for pd/TS/roots blowers of course).
Did you get SAE numbers along with the STD numbers @Andrew03SVT?
It's probably in the ball park of 770/700 SAE
I think at the end of the day....the 2.9 gen4 is going to produce the highest dyno number and more importantly....the highest trap speeds at the track. 150+ traps. If the removable inlet is a top priority that one just can't live without....you just have to be willing to be slower at the strip.